Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove UpdateOld changeset for Azure #3611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2023

Conversation

sfc-gh-jelsesiy
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The underlying SDK uses recordSetsClient.CreateOrUpdate() doc which allows us to exclusively rely on UpdateNew for record set updates. As a result, we're no longer running the risk of zone update failures causing outages as outlined in #2918

Fix #2918
Supersedes #3285

Checklist

  • Unit tests updated
  • End user documentation updated

The underlying SDK uses `recordSetsClient.CreateOrUpdate()` [doc](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/dns/record-sets/create-or-update) which allows us to exclusively rely on UpdateNew for record set updates.
As a result, we're no longer running the risk of zone update failures causing outages as outlined in kubernetes-sigs#2918

Fix kubernetes-sigs#2918
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 16, 2023
@sfc-gh-jelsesiy sfc-gh-jelsesiy marked this pull request as ready for review May 16, 2023 15:48
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels May 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from szuecs May 16, 2023 15:48
@sfc-gh-jelsesiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@szuecs Mind having a look at this PR? The previous PR has been opened for 4 months so I'm hoping this smaller one can be merged quicker. Thanks!

@szuecs
Copy link
Contributor

szuecs commented May 18, 2023

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label May 18, 2023
@szuecs
Copy link
Contributor

szuecs commented May 18, 2023

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sfc-gh-jelsesiy, szuecs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit aad9683 into kubernetes-sigs:master May 18, 2023
@sfc-gh-jelsesiy sfc-gh-jelsesiy deleted the issue-2918 branch May 18, 2023 20:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Azure DNS changes are implemented as delete-then-create, not atomic, could lead to NXDOMAIN
3 participants