Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add --exclude-record-types flag #3748

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

johngmyers
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Adds an --exclude-record-types flag. This allows for easier removal from the default --manage-record-types set.

Checklist

  • Unit tests updated
  • End user documentation updated

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 29, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 30, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 1, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 12, 2023
@johngmyers johngmyers force-pushed the exclude-managed branch 3 times, most recently from bf3c69d to ad8d30a Compare August 12, 2023 18:00
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 2, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 2, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 15, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 16, 2023
@johngmyers
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @mloiseleur

@mloiseleur
Copy link
Contributor

Between using:
--manage-record-types=CNAME,A
or
--exclude-record-type=AAAA
I'm unsure to understand how the second one is easier. As long as you (or other) see one, it's good for me.
The PR is quite straighforward, I have nothing to add on it.
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2023
@johngmyers
Copy link
Contributor Author

The issue is that as we add more record types to the default, removing a record type becomes increasingly troublesome.

With the CRD, having the default be so narrow is troublesome.

@johngmyers
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johngmyers

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 19, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit e0405a2 into kubernetes-sigs:master Sep 19, 2023
14 checks passed
@johngmyers johngmyers deleted the exclude-managed branch September 19, 2023 05:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants