-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only create per-object webhooks for configured types #152
Comments
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/reopen |
@erikgb: Reopened this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
Thanks for working on this :)
…On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 9:11 AM Erik Godding Boye ***@***.***> wrote:
/remove-lifecycle rotten
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#152 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE43PZF4FDE4MI6XP5Y4GMDXINFIFANCNFSM5P7EQRIQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hey Folks, |
Sorry, been very busy but looking at that PR now |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
Hey Folks, |
Hey @omaratdgtl There are only a few things left in the PR to clean up and then we can get it merged. Unfortunately those working on the PR are quite busy. If you wanted to take over the PR here #285 and clean up the last few items we can get it reviewed and merged! |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
We currently create one almighty "object" webhook that, if broken, can effectively block every object operation in the entire cluster (minus critical system namespaces), even for objects that are not being monitored by HNC.
We should modify the
HNCConfiguration
reconciler to dynamically generate webhooks only for the objects types that are being propagated by HNC. Note that we need to insert new webhooks into the existing webhook config, since HNC's copy of cert-controller mentions the HNC webhook config by name, so creating a whole new webhook config won't work. But that should be pretty easy.I'm guessing the best place to do this is to build a function similar to
[syncObjectReconcilers](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/hierarchical-namespaces/blob/281b24ff4c6d9fbbed59f6ac473b9c3cad79450f/internal/hncconfig/reconciler.go#L268)
, maybe calledsyncObjectWebhookConfigs
or something like that.I don't think this is a requirement for v1.0 but it would be nice if you felt like getting it in.
/assign @erikgb
/cc @rjbez17
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: