Add index revision to plugin overview page

[corneliusweig]

When resolving the index revision, be careful to always report a commit sha and not branch names.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: corneliusweig

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [corneliusweig]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #307 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #307   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.66%   55.66%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         918      918           
=======================================
  Hits          511      511           
  Misses        355      355           
  Partials       52       52

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 739c312...edd44d0. Read the comment docs.

[ahmetb]

I don’t think most users care about commit numbers.
Do you think this will serve a good purpose? Instead we can just tell them “run this command for the most up-to-date list”.

[corneliusweig]

Hmm 🤔, I agree that the exact commit number is not so important. But I also don't think that any user would run our page generator.

Basically, what needs to come across is that the page may be outdated. We can also add such a note without mentioning the commit number. But I thought in the current way a user can determine what has happened since last generating that overview page.

[ahmetb]

But I thought in the current way a user can determine what has happened since last generating that overview page.

For that to happen I think we actually need to link to plugins/ directory at that revision, and at the HEAD. I don't think anyone is realistically going to diff the two revisions.

So I recommend maybe we can just say:

for the most up-to-date list of plugins, visit krew-index repository or run kubectl krew search

wdyt?

[corneliusweig]

So I recommend maybe we can just say:

for the most up-to-date list of plugins, visit krew-index repository or run kubectl krew search

wdyt?

Ok with me. I'll update the PRs

[ahmetb]

Reminder to push updates here as well.

[corneliusweig]

Reminder to push updates here as well.

Sorry, that slipped through. I thought I had done that. Can you take a look?

[ahmetb]

/lgtm
thanks!