Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove no longer needed resource service #305

Conversation

196Ikuchil
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/area simulator
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

We no longer need each resource service.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

closes #139 #233

Special notes for your reviewer:

/label tide/merge-method-squash

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/simulator Issues or PRs related to the simulator. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. labels Jun 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. label Jun 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from Huang-Wei June 6, 2023 12:17
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 6, 2023
@196Ikuchil
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wait for #304

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 6, 2023
@sanposhiho
Copy link
Member

@196Ikuchil Sorry about the delay, FYI #304 is merged

@196Ikuchil
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 23, 2023
@196Ikuchil
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!
Please review this? 🙏

/assign @sanposhiho

Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 23, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 196Ikuchil, sanposhiho

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [196Ikuchil,sanposhiho]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/simulator Issues or PRs related to the simulator. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deprecate internal Service for each resource (NodeService, PodService... etc)
3 participants