-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why two different log packages? #1269
Comments
That being said, it's actually using
Right. Most things should try to just pass down a copy of |
/good-first-issue on the replacement of |
@DirectXMan12: Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Thanks very much for the background @DirectXMan12! :) I'll try to hop on this contribution early next week. |
@jaypipes That's a bug got snuck in. |
Confirm that as well with staticcheck (golanci-lint) we should move from
|
It seems no PR has been opened to fix the bug. |
/assign @camilamacedo86 |
I'm wondering why the manager's
main.go
uses thesigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/log/zap
library:kubebuilder/pkg/scaffold/v2/main.go
Line 139 in 19458ba
the webhook generator uses the
sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/log
package as well:kubebuilder/pkg/scaffold/v2/webhook/webhook.go
Line 94 in 19458ba
but the controller uses the
github.com/go-logr/logr
library:kubebuilder/pkg/scaffold/v2/controller.go
Line 74 in 19458ba
Would it be beneficial to standardize on a single package?
/triage support
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: