Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test scripts: add missing addons test, some refactoring #1449

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2020

Conversation

estroz
Copy link
Contributor

@estroz estroz commented Mar 28, 2020

  • generate_testdata.sh: refactor common code for v2 projects
  • test.sh: add missing addons test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 28, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 28, 2020
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@estroz where is the Travis CI execution which will verify the changes made in this PR?
Could you please check that?

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/hold since the Trevis test was not executed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 30, 2020
@estroz estroz closed this Mar 30, 2020
@estroz estroz reopened this Mar 30, 2020
@estroz
Copy link
Contributor Author

estroz commented Mar 30, 2020

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 30, 2020
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

Really good spot 👍
All passing in the CI.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, estroz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 30, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

You may need to close and re-open this one.
Some bug did not return the Travis CI result to the GH.

@estroz estroz closed this Mar 31, 2020
@estroz estroz reopened this Mar 31, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

camilamacedo86 commented Apr 1, 2020

/test continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/retest

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/test all

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

camilamacedo86 commented Apr 14, 2020

/test trevis-ci

@estroz estroz closed this Apr 14, 2020
@estroz estroz reopened this Apr 14, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit abb49b4 into kubernetes-sigs:master Apr 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants