Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Prepare for release 3.4.0 #2643

Merged
merged 92 commits into from
Apr 28, 2022
Merged

🌱 Prepare for release 3.4.0 #2643

merged 92 commits into from
Apr 28, 2022

Conversation

ryantking
Copy link
Contributor

@ryantking ryantking commented Apr 27, 2022

Description
Add latest commits from master to release-3

Closes: #2644

viveksyngh and others added 30 commits January 17, 2022 17:36
Remove namespace from ClusterRoleBinding
Also updated old prerequisites for better clarity.

Co-authored-by: Camila Macedo <7708031+camilamacedo86@users.noreply.github.com>
…versioning

📖 Fix broken links to CLI plugin versioning
📖 Update go prerequisites for the 3.3 release
📖  Remove namespace from ClusterRoleBinding
🌱 Add script for checking licenses
Co-authored-by: Camila Macedo <7708031+camilamacedo86@users.noreply.github.com>
🐛 fix issue to scaffold same Kind for different groups with multi-group support by using group name in crd/patches and rbac editor/viewer manifests
Co-authored-by: Camila Macedo <7708031+camilamacedo86@users.noreply.github.com>
📖  Fix link for component-config-tutorial
We need to copy the channels directory in the Dockerfile, particularly
now that we're running with non-root permissions and it is no longer a
one-liner.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Singh <svivekkumar@vmware.com>
Fix incomplete instruction for validating webhook.
More and more users are now using M1 chips for development so publishing
kubebuilder-tools in darwin/arm64 arch will enable them to use the
project natively on their machines without needing to apply custom ways
of solving missing dependencies.

Addresses #2505

Signed-off-by: dntosas <ntosas@gmail.com>
📖 Fix incomplete instruction for validating webhook
 ✨ : Generate Dockerfile from declarative plugin
…images

✨ [build] Add support for darwin/arm64 arch
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hu <tao.hu@merico.dev>
📖 Fix link for ControllerManagerConfigurationSpec
Signed-off-by: Ryan King <ryking@redhat.com>

In go 1.18, using `go get` to install go binaries will be removed from
in favor of using `go install`. This commit updates the Makefile
templates to use alternative installation methods to install the tools
used at generation.

Since `go install` adds extra constraints on what go packages can be
installed, not all tools were a simple `go get` => `go install` change:

- `kustomize`: Incompatible with `go install` because its `go.mod` has
`exclude` and `replace` directives. The template now uses the official
install script.
- `controller-gen`: Fully compatible with `go install`.
- `setup-envtest`: Can be installed using `go install`, but not a
specific version since the repo does not have the tag scheme since it is
in a sub-module. It would need a tag in the format
`tools/setup-envtest/vX.Y.Z`.

The commit also regenerated all book source code using this new pattern.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 27, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ryantking. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 27, 2022
@ryantking ryantking mentioned this pull request Apr 27, 2022
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/approved

Great 🥇

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 27, 2022
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/approved

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, ryantking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 28, 2022
@erikgb
Copy link
Contributor

erikgb commented Apr 28, 2022

/lgtm
/hold

Holding up the PR in case anyone else would like to take a look. Feel free to unhold @camilamacedo86.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 28, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 28, 2022
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 28, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 75241ab into release-3 Apr 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.