Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📖 Update README.md - Clarify that monthly Kubebuilder sync meetings are scheduled but most syncing happens offline via Slack #4172

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2024

Conversation

camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

…ngs are scheduled but most syncing happens offline via Slack

We haven't been holding the meetings due to a lack of topics on the agenda, and we've been syncing more frequently offline. This message is just to clarify how we're currently working.

…re scheduled but most syncing happens offline via Slack

We haven't been holding the meetings due to a lack of topics on the agenda, and we've been syncing more frequently offline. This message is just to clarify how we're currently working.
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 15, 2024
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title 📖 Update README.md - Clarify that monthly Kubebuilder sync meeti… 📖 Update README.md - Clarify that monthly Kubebuilder sync meetings are scheduled but most syncing happens offline via Slack Sep 15, 2024
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

Since it is just a nit I will move forward here.
We have big PRs that we really need help on review.

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 15554b6 into master Sep 21, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants