Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add additional network configuration options to external Openstack CCM (#6083) #6085

Conversation

Sryther
Copy link
Contributor

@Sryther Sryther commented May 6, 2020

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Additional configuration options for external OpenStack CCM:

  • Added Network configuration in cloud.conf which can be overriden:
    • Added parameter to disable IPv6 support
    • Added parameter to define public networks names
    • Added parameter to define internal networks names

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #6083

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels May 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @Sryther!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kubespray 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kubespray has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Sryther. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from floryut and LuckySB May 6, 2020 16:49
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 6, 2020
@Sryther Sryther changed the title [WIP] Add additional network configuration options to external Openstack CCM (#6083) Add additional network configuration options to external Openstack CCM (#6083) May 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 6, 2020
@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented May 6, 2020

I finally signed really the CLA

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 6, 2020
@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented May 6, 2020

/assign @Atoms

@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented May 6, 2020

/unassign @Atoms

Sorry ^^ I tried some things

@floryut
Copy link
Member

floryut commented May 8, 2020

@Sryther could you rebase ? test failure are now fixed in master branch.. thank you and sorry about that!

@Sryther Sryther force-pushed the network-external-provider-openstack-cloud-config-6083 branch from fd77b11 to d5f1fc9 Compare May 8, 2020 13:30
@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented May 8, 2020

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Sryther: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented May 8, 2020

It seems the pipeline failed because it reached its activity limit. Am I right? What can I do?

@floryut
Copy link
Member

floryut commented May 8, 2020

It seems the pipeline failed because it reached its activity limit. Am I right? What can I do?

Yes lot of activity today.. The CI is kind of overloaded, I've restarted your pipeline

@LuckySB
Copy link
Contributor

LuckySB commented May 10, 2020

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 10, 2020
@floryut
Copy link
Member

floryut commented May 10, 2020

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 10, 2020
@Miouge1
Copy link
Contributor

Miouge1 commented May 12, 2020

Great if you can review this @alijahnas

/assgin @alijahnas

Copy link
Contributor

@alijahnas alijahnas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @Sryther
Thanks for the contribution.
Can you add a section in the doc https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray/blob/master/docs/openstack.md#upgrade-from-the-in-tree-to-the-external-cloud-provider
where you can provide explanation that in case of a multi-nic OpenStack VMs, one should set these parameters? You can also link to your issue and the issue from cloud-provider-openstack for information.
#6083
kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack#407

Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 15, 2020
@Sryther Sryther force-pushed the network-external-provider-openstack-cloud-config-6083 branch 2 times, most recently from 2db5a05 to 9864803 Compare May 15, 2020 13:49
@alijahnas
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @Sryther
/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 15, 2020
@Sryther Sryther force-pushed the network-external-provider-openstack-cloud-config-6083 branch from 9864803 to afec9a1 Compare May 16, 2020 10:25
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 16, 2020
@Sryther
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sryther commented May 16, 2020

I rebased since I saw builds failing. I hope it'll fix them.

@alijahnas
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 18, 2020
@Miouge1
Copy link
Contributor

Miouge1 commented May 18, 2020

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Miouge1, Sryther

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 18, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b5aaaf8 into kubernetes-sigs:master May 18, 2020
LuckySB pushed a commit to southbridgeio/kubespray that referenced this pull request May 29, 2020
kubernetes-sigs#6083) (kubernetes-sigs#6085)

* Add additional network configuration options to external Openstack CCM (kubernetes-sigs#6083)

* Change the default version of external openstack cloud controller image to v1.18.1 since there was an issue in v1.18.0 where some IPs of the private network were ignored

* Change Network section in external-openstack-cloud-config.j2 to Networking

* Add networking customization information in the openstack documentation
@floryut floryut mentioned this pull request Aug 14, 2020
@Sryther Sryther deleted the network-external-provider-openstack-cloud-config-6083 branch May 17, 2021 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Network section for external-openstack-cloud-config's cloud.conf in templates
7 participants