-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 228
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add roadmap to kueue #438
Add roadmap to kueue #438
Conversation
@kerthcet: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I think that, if we are going to publish a roadmap, we should have some priorities and estimated times. Otherwise it might bring more questions from readers than providing answers. Maybe we can discuss this in the WG Batch meeting? |
The agenda for Dec 22nd is still empty https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XOeUN-K0aKmJJNq7H07r74n-mGgSFyiEDQ3ecwsGhec/edit?pli=1# |
At the least, we can tell people how we will influence the project direction. But it will be really great if we can have a developing plan based on priorities. A roadmap for full 2023? I think we can talk about this in the community meeting to get some feedbacks what users want most. I'll add to agenda later. |
Thanks for documenting the roadmap, I will take a look after you address the open comments from aldo. |
Updated. |
looks good, but should we include time estimates to avoid questions? |
update this as roadmap for 2023, make sense? We can discuss this later in community meeting. |
4831c3e
to
4ecb36c
Compare
4ecb36c
to
a5bdee7
Compare
bfb6fb7
to
3e08ab3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
@ahg-g anything to add?
README.md
Outdated
|
||
- Job preemption to reclaim borrowed quota and to accommodate high priority jobs [#83](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/83), this is planned for v0.3 | ||
- Cooperative preemption support for workloads that implement checkpointing [#477](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/477) | ||
- More advanced allocation strategies for better resource sharing [#312](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/312) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a bit vague, perhaps specifically say: "Tunable flavor assignment to tradeoff minimizing cost vs minimizing borrowing"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated, I thought this was merged already. 🙃
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
Signed-off-by: Kante Yin <kerthcet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kante Yin <kerthcet@gmail.com>
8bad91f
to
8bc39d4
Compare
I think we should also add a page to the website next. |
README.md
Outdated
|
||
- Job preemption to reclaim borrowed quota and to accommodate high priority jobs [#83](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/83), this is planned for v0.3 | ||
- Cooperative preemption support for workloads that implement checkpointing [#477](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/477) | ||
- More flavor assignment strategies support, e.g. _minimizing cost_ vs _minimizing borrowing_ [#312](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/312) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- More flavor assignment strategies support, e.g. _minimizing cost_ vs _minimizing borrowing_ [#312](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/312) | |
- Flavor assignment strategies, e.g. _minimizing cost_ vs _minimizing borrowing_ [#312](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kueue/issues/312) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated
Signed-off-by: Kante Yin <kerthcet@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, kerthcet The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
Signed-off-by: kerthcet kerthcet@gmail.com
What type of PR is this?
/kind document
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #424
Special notes for your reviewer: