Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Skip adding nameprefix to namespace" #516

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2018
Merged

Conversation

Liujingfang1
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #488

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Liujingfang1

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 26, 2018
@Liujingfang1 Liujingfang1 requested review from mengqiy and removed request for pwittrock October 26, 2018 21:42
@mengqiy
Copy link
Member

mengqiy commented Oct 26, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 26, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 383b3e7 into master Oct 26, 2018
@iakat
Copy link

iakat commented May 1, 2019

Why was this reverted?

@sknigh
Copy link

sknigh commented Jun 13, 2019

@Liujingfang1 I would like to know why this was reverted as well. Is there a way to define a namespace resource, and use a namespace+nameprefix in kustomization.yaml?

@mengqiy
Copy link
Member

mengqiy commented Jun 13, 2019

IIRC the change in #488 actually is not backward compatible. Be I can't recall the details.
I guess @Liujingfang1 should know.

@natasha41575 natasha41575 deleted the revert-488-prefix branch March 30, 2022 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants