Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow specifying the scheduler container entrypoint in the helm chart #814

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

chotiwat
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

The current chart template doesn't support the older kube-scheduler image which doesn't specify ENTRYPOINT in the image. This PR allows customizing the container entrypoint through the new scheduler.command value.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Oct 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Oct 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @chotiwat!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Oct 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @chotiwat. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 31, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-scheduler-plugins canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fd14d64
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-scheduler-plugins/deploys/6722d0911828770008bb383a

@Huang-Wei
Copy link
Contributor

By "older kube-scheduler image", do you mean the v0.29.7 image? If so, we changed back the default entrypoint to /bin/scheduler (#794) - which is available in v0.29.8 and master.

And we will keep the path unchanged in the future, for backwards compatibility. Did it resolve your issue?

xref: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C09TP78DV/p1723546975114219

@chotiwat
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Huang-Wei By older images, I mean the ones before v0.29, e.g. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/scheduler-plugins/blob/v0.27.9/build/scheduler/Dockerfile#L28. I'd like to use the latest chart with an older image version to match my org's k8s clusters.

@Huang-Wei
Copy link
Contributor

ok, I see the motiviation.

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 31, 2024
@Huang-Wei
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chotiwat, Huang-Wei

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit fb31908 into kubernetes-sigs:master Oct 31, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants