Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update kube-rbac-proxy to v0.13.0 #1023

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Update kube-rbac-proxy to v0.13.0 #1023

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2022

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Update it to the latest release.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Does this PR have test?

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Updated kube-rbac-proxy to v0.13.0.

@saschagrunert
Update kube-rbac-proxy to v0.13.0
d145b9f 
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 8, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 8, 2022
pjbgf
pjbgf approved these changes Jul 8, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@pjbgf pjbgf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 8, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pjbgf, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [pjbgf,saschagrunert]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-security-profiles-operator-test-e2e

@JAORMX
Copy link
Contributor

JAORMX commented Jul 8, 2022

/lgtm

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-security-profiles-operator-test-e2e

1 similar comment
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-security-profiles-operator-test-e2e

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a704af9 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jul 12, 2022
@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the kube-rbac-proxy branch July 12, 2022 08:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pjbgf pjbgf pjbgf approved these changes

@cmurphy cmurphy Awaiting requested review from cmurphy

Assignees

@JAORMX JAORMX

@pjbgf pjbgf

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@saschagrunert @k8s-ci-robot @JAORMX @pjbgf