Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CA 1.29 #6677 cherry-pick] fix: scale up broken for providers not implementing NodeGroup.GetOptions() #6761

Conversation

towca
Copy link
Collaborator

@towca towca commented Apr 24, 2024

Properly handle calls to NodeGroup.GetOptions() that return cloudprovider.ErrNotImplemented in the scale up path.

Cherry-pick of #6677 to Cluster Autoscaler 1.29 branch

…ons()

Properly handle calls to `NodeGroup.GetOptions()` that return
`cloudprovider.ErrNotImplemented` in the scale up path.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 24, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 24, 2024
@MaciekPytel
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 24, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MaciekPytel, towca

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 32ac397 into kubernetes:cluster-autoscaler-release-1.29 Apr 24, 2024
6 checks passed
BigDarkClown pushed a commit to BigDarkClown/autoscaler that referenced this pull request May 27, 2024
[CA 1.29 kubernetes#6677 cherry-pick] fix: scale up broken for providers not implementing NodeGroup.GetOptions()
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants