Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support deleting previous objects in kubectl apply #128

Closed
5 of 23 tasks
smarterclayton opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 11 comments
Closed
5 of 23 tasks

Support deleting previous objects in kubectl apply #128

smarterclayton opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 11 comments
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps.

Comments

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

smarterclayton commented Oct 11, 2016

Description

When creating objects with kubectl apply, it is frequently desired to make changes to the config that remove objects and then re-apply and have those objects deleted. This feature will support pruning which deletes objects previously applied that no longer exist in the source config.

Progress Tracker

  • Alpha
    • Write and maintain draft quality doc
      • During development keep a doc up-to-date about the desired experience of the feature and how someone can try the feature in its current state. Think of it as the README of your new feature and a skeleton for the docs to be written before the Kubernetes release. Paste link to Google Doc: DOC-LINK
    • Design Approval
      • Design Proposal. kubectl: implement kubectl apply --prune kubernetes#33075
      • Decide which repo this feature's code will be checked into. Not everything needs to land in the core kubernetes repo. REPO-NAME
      • Initial API review (if API). Maybe same PR as design doc. PR-NUMBER
        • Any code that changes an API (/pkg/apis/...)
        • cc @kubernetes/api
      • Identify shepherd (your SIG lead and/or kubernetes-pm@googlegroups.com will be able to help you). My Shepherd is: replace.me@replaceme.com (and/or GH Handle)
        • A shepherd is an individual who will help acquaint you with the process of getting your feature into the repo, identify reviewers and provide feedback on the feature. They are not (necessarily) the code reviewer of the feature, or tech lead for the area.
        • The shepherd is not responsible for showing up to Kubernetes-PM meetings and/or communicating if the feature is on-track to make the release goals. That is still your responsibility.
      • Identify secondary/backup contact point. My Secondary Contact Point is: replace.me@replaceme.com (and/or GH Handle)
    • Write (code + tests + docs) then get them merged. ALL-PR-NUMBERS
      • Code needs to be disabled by default. Verified by code OWNERS
      • Minimal testing
      • Minimal docs
        • cc @kubernetes/docs on docs PR
        • cc @kubernetes/feature-reviewers on this issue to get approval before checking this off
        • New apis: Glossary Section Item in the docs repo: kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io
      • Update release notes
  • Beta
    • Testing is sufficient for beta
    • User docs with tutorials
      • Updated walkthrough / tutorial in the docs repo: kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io
      • cc @kubernetes/docs on docs PR
      • cc @kubernetes/feature-reviewers on this issue to get approval before checking this off
    • Thorough API review
      • cc @kubernetes/api
  • Stable
    • docs/proposals/foo.md moved to docs/design/foo.md
      • cc @kubernetes/feature-reviewers on this issue to get approval before checking this off
    • Soak, load testing
    • detailed user docs and examples
      • cc @kubernetes/docs
      • cc @kubernetes/feature-reviewers on this issue to get approval before checking this off

FEATURE_STATUS is used for feature tracking and to be updated by @kubernetes/feature-reviewers.
FEATURE_STATUS: IN_DEVELOPMENT

More advice:

Design

  • Once you get LGTM from a @kubernetes/feature-reviewers member, you can check this checkbox, and the reviewer will apply the "design-complete" label.

Coding

  • Use as many PRs as you need. Write tests in the same or different PRs, as is convenient for you.
  • As each PR is merged, add a comment to this issue referencing the PRs. Code goes in the http://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes repository,
    and sometimes http://github.com/kubernetes/contrib, or other repos.
  • When you are done with the code, apply the "code-complete" label.
  • When the feature has user docs, please add a comment mentioning @kubernetes/feature-reviewers and they will
    check that the code matches the proposed feature and design, and that everything is done, and that there is adequate
    testing. They won't do detailed code review: that already happened when your PRs were reviewed.
    When that is done, you can check this box and the reviewer will apply the "code-complete" label.

Docs

  • Write user docs and get them merged in.
  • User docs go into http://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io.
  • When the feature has user docs, please add a comment mentioning @kubernetes/docs.
  • When you get LGTM, you can check this checkbox, and the reviewer will apply the "docs-complete" label.
@smarterclayton smarterclayton added the sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. label Oct 11, 2016
@davidopp
Copy link
Member

davidopp commented Oct 11, 2016

I'm worried that we're starting to turn the features repo into another kubernetes/kubernetes issues repo, and it will become as undigestible.

I would argue this one doesn't meet the bar for going in the features repo.

@bgrant0607
Copy link
Member

@mikedanese Isn't this done?

@grodrigues3
Copy link
Contributor

@mikedanese can you update the checkboxes in the PR body with the parts that are finished.

@jaredbhatti
Copy link

Ping. Is there a docs PR for this?

@mikedanese
Copy link
Member

Sorry, I missed this one.

Original issue: kubernetes/kubernetes#19805
Implementation: kubernetes/kubernetes#33075

There is command documentation like all of our other commands. Examples are being added in kubernetes/kubernetes#37397 at which point it will have as much documentation as any other kubectl flag. It will be labeled as alpha in the v1.5 kubectl help output, pending a sign off from @pwittrock .

cc @MrHohn

@pwittrock
Copy link
Member

lgtm.

@jaredbhatti
Copy link

Ok. I'll mark this "no docs needed" Thanks!

@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@mikedanese @pwittrock can you confirm that this item targets beta in 1.6?

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

Prevent issues from auto-closing with an /lifecycle frozen comment.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 1, 2018
@mikedanese mikedanese removed their assignment Jan 2, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 7, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

justaugustus pushed a commit to justaugustus/enhancements that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests