Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identify quota changes needed for ingress jobs, create pool of ingress projects #1093

Closed
1 of 6 tasks
spiffxp opened this issue Jul 31, 2020 · 17 comments
Closed
1 of 6 tasks
Assignees
Labels
area/prow Setting up or working with prow in general, prow.k8s.io, prow build clusters lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release.
Milestone

Comments

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Jul 31, 2020

This is like #851 but for ingress

The default quotas for an e2e project (eg: k8s-infra-e2e-gce-project) MAY be insufficient to run ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress

Currently this job runs in the google.com k8s-prow-builds cluster, using a project from that boskos' ingress-project pool

  • Identify whether ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress can run against a stock e2e project (it can! so this is much lower priority, since we don't need ingress projects for release/merge-blocking job migration)
  • Identify what quotas are set that make ingress-projects differ from a default e2e project
  • Identify what jobs this will allow us to migrate
  • Identify pool size
  • Provision pool in kubernetes.io org
  • Add pool to k8s-infra-prow-build's boskos
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Aug 4, 2020

$ for prj in k8s-ingress-boskos-01 k8s-infra-e2e-ingress-project; do
  gcloud compute project-info describe --project=$prj > $prj.compute-project-info.yaml
done
$ diff -yW80 k8s-infra-e2e-ingress-project.compute-project-info.yaml k8s-ingress-boskos-01.compute-project-info.yaml | grep -A3 "|.*limit"
- limit: 21.0			      |	- limit: 50.0
  metric: STATIC_ADDRESSES		  metric: STATIC_ADDRESSES
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 250.0				- limit: 250.0
--
- limit: 45.0			      |	- limit: 100.0
  metric: FORWARDING_RULES		  metric: FORWARDING_RULES
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 150.0				- limit: 150.0
--
- limit: 150.0			      |	- limit: 55.0
  metric: HEALTH_CHECKS			  metric: HEALTH_CHECKS
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 69.0			      |	- limit: 100.0
  metric: IN_USE_ADDRESSES		  metric: IN_USE_ADDRESSES
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 150.0				- limit: 150.0
--
- limit: 30.0			      |	- limit: 50.0
  metric: TARGET_HTTP_PROXIES		  metric: TARGET_HTTP_PROXIES
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 30.0			      |	- limit: 50.0
  metric: URL_MAPS			  metric: URL_MAPS
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 9.0			      |	- limit: 100.0
  metric: BACKEND_SERVICES		  metric: BACKEND_SERVICES
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 300.0				- limit: 300.0
--
- limit: 30.0			      |	- limit: 50.0
  metric: TARGET_HTTPS_PROXIES		  metric: TARGET_HTTPS_PROXIES
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 30.0			      |	- limit: 50.0
  metric: SSL_CERTIFICATES		  metric: SSL_CERTIFICATES
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 175.0				- limit: 175.0
--
- limit: 100.0			      |	- limit: 200.0
  metric: SECURITY_POLICY_RULES		  metric: SECURITY_POLICY_RULES
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 45.0				- limit: 45.0
--
- limit: 300.0			      |	- limit: 1000.0
  metric: NETWORK_ENDPOINT_GROUPS	  metric: NETWORK_ENDPOINT_GROUPS
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 6.0				- limit: 6.0
--
- limit: 15.0			      |	- limit: 50.0
  metric: EXTERNAL_VPN_GATEWAYS		  metric: EXTERNAL_VPN_GATEWAYS
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0
- limit: 1.0				- limit: 1.0
--
- limit: 1024.0			      |	- limit: 128.0
  metric: STATIC_BYOIP_ADDRESSES	  metric: STATIC_BYOIP_ADDRESSES
  usage: 0.0				  usage: 0.0

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Aug 4, 2020

Jobs that use this project type:

  • ci-cri-containerd-e2e-gci-gce-ingress
  • ci-ingress-gce-e2e
  • ci-ingress-gce-e2e-multi-zone
  • ci-ingress-gce-e2e-release-1-6
  • ci-kubemci-ingress-conformance
  • ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-k8sbeta-ingress
  • ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-k8sstable1-ingress
  • ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-k8sstable2-ingress
  • ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-k8sstable3-ingress
  • ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress
  • ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress-manual-network

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Aug 4, 2020

/assign

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Aug 4, 2020

Will use kubernetes/test-infra#18663 as a canary job, should be able to let it schedule (or re-run it) to see if I've gotten quotas correct

I'm starting with no increase in quotas at all

@spiffxp spiffxp moved this from Backlog to In Progress in CI Policy Improvements Aug 4, 2020
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Aug 7, 2020

https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-testing-canaries#gci-gce-ingress&width=20&graph-metrics=test-duration-minutes - so it, uh, looks like the release-blocking ingress job runs just fine with the default quotas

https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-master-blocking#gci-gce-ingress&width=20&graph-metrics=test-duration-minutes - and comparing to the sig-release-master-blocking runs, it performs basically the same as well

So this task isn't strictly necessary to migrate release-blocking jobs. Are there any presubmits I'm missing?

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Aug 31, 2020

There are no presubmits that use this

Remaining jobs that use this project type

  • ci-cri-containerd-e2e-gci-gce-ingress (containerd/cri + kubernetes periodic)
  • ci-ingress-gce-e2e (kubernetes periodic)
  • ci-ingress-gce-e2e-multi-zone (kubernetes periodic)
  • ci-ingress-gce-e2e-release-1-6 (kubernetes periodic)
  • ci-kubemci-ingress-conformance (GoogleCloudPlatform/k8s-multicluster-ingress)
  • ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress-manual-network (kubernetes periodic)

ameukam added a commit to ameukam/test-infra that referenced this issue Oct 29, 2020
Duplicate of ci-ingress-gce-e2e that validates the job can run on
k8s-infra-prow-build.

Ref: kubernetes/k8s.io#1093
Part of : kubernetes#18549

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Meukam <ameukam@gmail.com>
ameukam added a commit to ameukam/test-infra that referenced this issue Oct 29, 2020
Duplicate of ci-ingress-gce-e2e that validates the job can run on
k8s-infra-prow-build.

Ref: kubernetes/k8s.io#1093
Part of : kubernetes#18549

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Meukam <ameukam@gmail.com>
ameukam added a commit to ameukam/test-infra that referenced this issue Oct 29, 2020
Duplicate of ci-ingress-gce-e2e that validates the job can run on
k8s-infra-prow-build.

Ref: kubernetes/k8s.io#1093
Part of : kubernetes#18549

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Meukam <ameukam@gmail.com>
ameukam added a commit to ameukam/test-infra that referenced this issue Oct 29, 2020
Duplicate of ci-ingress-gce-e2e that validates the job can run on
k8s-infra-prow-build.

Ref: kubernetes/k8s.io#1093
Part of : kubernetes#18549

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Meukam <ameukam@gmail.com>
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 29, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 29, 2020
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Jan 15, 2021

/remove-lifecycle rotten
We still don't know whether we need ingress projects. These are the jobs we should try migrating to confirm whether we do: #1093 (comment)

The approach I would recommend is switching a job to run on k8s-infra-prow-build, and switch from boskos (--gcp-project-type=) to manual (--gcp-project=k8s-infra-e2e-ingress-project`). If the job is high visibility-enough, consider a canary job instead. If it doesn't run due to quota issues, great, we've identified that we do need special ingress projects, and we can use the failure to determine what needs to be customized.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jan 15, 2021
@spiffxp spiffxp added this to Needs Triage in sig-k8s-infra Jan 20, 2021
@spiffxp spiffxp added the priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. label Jan 22, 2021
@spiffxp spiffxp moved this from Needs Triage to Backlog (infra to migrate) in sig-k8s-infra Feb 19, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 22, 2021
@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Apr 23, 2021

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 23, 2021
@ameukam ameukam added this to the v1.23 milestone Jul 16, 2021
@spiffxp spiffxp added this to To Triage in sig-testing issues Jul 27, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. and removed wg/k8s-infra labels Sep 29, 2021
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Oct 1, 2021

/remove-sig testing
/sig network

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. and removed sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Oct 1, 2021
@spiffxp spiffxp removed this from To Triage in sig-testing issues Nov 24, 2021
@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Dec 14, 2021

/milestone clear

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed this from the v1.23 milestone Dec 14, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 14, 2022
@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Mar 15, 2022

/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Mar 15, 2022
@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Mar 3, 2024

All ingress-gce related jobs have been migrated.

See:

/close
/milestone v1.30
/lifecycle clear

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.30 milestone Mar 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ameukam: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

All ingress-gce related jobs have been migrated.

See:

/close
/milestone v1.30
/lifecycle clear

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sig-k8s-infra automation moved this from Backlog (infra to migrate) to Done Mar 3, 2024
CI Policy Improvements automation moved this from In Progress to Closed Mar 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/prow Setting up or working with prow in general, prow.k8s.io, prow build clusters lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release.
Projects
sig-k8s-infra
  
Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants