Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

audit: update as of 2021-08-05 #2456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021

Conversation

k8s-infra-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Audit Updates wg-k8s-infra

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @k8s-infra-ci-robot. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 3, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/audit Audit of project resources, audit followup issues, code in audit/ wg/k8s-infra cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 3, 2021
@k8s-infra-ci-robot k8s-infra-ci-robot changed the title audit: update as of 2021-08-03 audit: update as of 2021-08-04 Aug 4, 2021
@k8s-infra-ci-robot k8s-infra-ci-robot force-pushed the autoaudit-prow branch 8 times, most recently from 9d31b6a to 47198c8 Compare August 4, 2021 17:24
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 4, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 4, 2021
@k8s-infra-ci-robot k8s-infra-ci-robot force-pushed the autoaudit-prow branch 2 times, most recently from 1a4f2fd to 46bbada Compare August 4, 2021 23:18
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 4, 2021
@k8s-infra-ci-robot k8s-infra-ci-robot changed the title audit: update as of 2021-08-04 audit: update as of 2021-08-05 Aug 5, 2021
@k8s-infra-ci-robot k8s-infra-ci-robot force-pushed the autoaudit-prow branch 2 times, most recently from ce3e7d3 to 937703a Compare August 5, 2021 03:26
@k8s-infra-ci-robot k8s-infra-ci-robot force-pushed the autoaudit-prow branch 4 times, most recently from 1cae727 to 8aaa7fd Compare August 5, 2021 19:26
Copy link
Member

@spiffxp spiffxp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
},
{
"members": [
"serviceAccount:k8s-metrics@k8s-infra-prow-build-trusted.iam.gserviceaccount.com"
"serviceAccount:k8s-metrics@k8s-infra-prow-build-trusted.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
"serviceAccount:k8s-triage@k8s-infra-prow-build-trusted.iam.gserviceaccount.com"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Expected, this is #2454

"binaryAuthorization": {},
"clusterIpv4Cidr": "10.4.0.0/14",
"createTime": "2020-04-30T23:44:46+00:00",
"currentMasterVersion": "1.20.8-gke.900",
"currentNodeVersion": "1.19.9-gke.1900 *",
"currentNodeVersion": "1.20.8-gke.900",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

prow-build-trusted is now at v1.20

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
"clusterIpv4Cidr": "10.32.0.0/14",
"createTime": "2020-04-30T21:31:49+00:00",
"currentMasterVersion": "1.20.8-gke.900",
"currentNodeVersion": "1.19.9-gke.1900 *",
"currentNodeVersion": "1.20.8-gke.900",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

prow-build is also now at v1.20

@@ -17,17 +17,15 @@
},
{
"members": [
"serviceAccount:k8s-metrics@k8s-infra-prow-build-trusted.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
"serviceAccount:triage@k8s-gubernator.iam.gserviceaccount.com"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Expected, this was cleanup code introduced with #2454

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
"members": [
"group:k8s-infra-artifact-admins@kubernetes.io",
"group:k8s-infra-prow-oncall@kubernetes.io",
"serviceAccount:k8s-metrics@k8s-infra-prow-build-trusted.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
"serviceAccount:k8s-triage@k8s-infra-prow-build-trusted.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's unfortunate git interprets this as a move. What's actually happening here is two things:

Comment on lines +28 to +32
"members": [
"serviceAccount:k8s-metrics@k8s-infra-prow-build-trusted.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
"serviceAccount:k8s-triage@k8s-infra-prow-build-trusted.iam.gserviceaccount.com"
],
"role": "roles/bigquery.user"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Expected, this is #2461

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
{
"createTime": "2021-08-04T22:01:54.096956Z",
"name": "projects/127754664067/secrets/k8s-infra-prow-cookie",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm going to assume this is @ameukam as part of #2235

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
{
"createTime": "2021-08-04T22:26:58.024164Z",
"name": "projects/127754664067/secrets/k8s-infra-prow-github-oauth-config",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto re: @ameukam via #2235

Comment on lines +182 to +185
"networkConfig": {
"podIpv4CidrBlock": "10.40.0.0/14",
"podRange": "gke-aaa-pods-4d0eb763"
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ameukam I never saw anything about this when running terraform so I'm going to assume this was GKE auto-applying this change

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"displayName":"spiffxp-artifacts","mosaicLayout":{"columns":12,"tiles":[{"height":4,"widget":{"title":"GCS Bucket - Sent bytes for .*k8s-artifacts-prod.* by label.bucket_name [SUM]","xyChart":{"chartOptions":{"mode":"COLOR"},"dataSets":[{"legendTemplate":"${resource.labels.bucket_name}","minAlignmentPeriod":"60s","plotType":"LINE","timeSeriesQuery":{"timeSeriesFilter":{"aggregation":{"alignmentPeriod":"60s","crossSeriesReducer":"REDUCE_SUM","groupByFields":["resource.label.\"bucket_name\""],"perSeriesAligner":"ALIGN_RATE"},"filter":"metric.type=\"storage.googleapis.com/network/sent_bytes_count\" resource.type=\"gcs_bucket\" resource.label.\"bucket_name\"=monitoring.regex.full_match(\".*k8s-artifacts-prod.*\")","secondaryAggregation":{"alignmentPeriod":"60s"}}}}],"timeshiftDuration":"0s","yAxis":{"label":"y1Axis","scale":"LINEAR"}}},"width":6}]},"name":"projects/127754664067/dashboards/9d1e0395-e764-4c42-ae25-d31f43fe157b"}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was me manually messing around, I created a useful graph in metrics explorer (for #2318 (comment)) and wanted someplace to save it. I personally don't have a problem with these being manually created right now; I'm pretty sure restore would look like manually re-importing from this file.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: k8s-infra-ci-robot, spiffxp

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 263de85 into kubernetes:main Aug 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.23 milestone Aug 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/audit Audit of project resources, audit followup issues, code in audit/ cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants