Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Peter Rifel (rifelpet) as prow viewer #6533

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rifelpet
Copy link
Member

@rifelpet rifelpet commented Mar 6, 2024

This adds my personal email to the prow viewer group. I'm working on migrating kops jobs to the community-owned prow clusters and having this viewer access will be helpful for troubleshooting.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. area/access Define who has access to what via IAM bindings, role bindings, policy, etc. area/groups Google Groups management, code in groups/ sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Mar 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rifelpet
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign xmcqueen for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Mar 6, 2024

/lgtm
/cc @ameukam

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 6, 2024
@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Mar 6, 2024

I don't think you need this anymore:

@rifelpet
Copy link
Member Author

rifelpet commented Mar 6, 2024

Thanks @ameukam I'll look into that. By the way is there any guidance about which community owned clusters we should migrate to? I see the kops e2e jobs are spread across multiple prow clusters.

@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Mar 6, 2024

Thanks @ameukam I'll look into that. By the way is there any guidance about which community owned clusters we should migrate to? I see the kops e2e jobs are spread across multiple prow clusters.

@rifelpet #5127 (comment)

@rifelpet rifelpet closed this Mar 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/access Define who has access to what via IAM bindings, role bindings, policy, etc. area/groups Google Groups management, code in groups/ cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants