Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix builder.Builder WithMetrics signature #1455

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2021

Conversation

L3n41c
Copy link
Contributor

@L3n41c L3n41c commented Apr 15, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:

The WithMetrics method signature changed from

func (b *Builder) WithMetrics(r *prometheus.Registry) {

to

func (b *Builder) WithMetrics(r prometheus.Registerer) {

in #1223 but one occurrence was forgotten.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Fixes the following compilation error when kube-state-metrics is used as a GO dependency of an external project:

	*builder.Builder does not implement "k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/pkg/builder/types".BuilderInterface (wrong type for WithMetrics method)
		have WithMetrics(*prometheus.Registry)
		want WithMetrics(prometheus.Registerer)

The `WithMetrics` method signature changed from

```
func (b *Builder) WithMetrics(r *prometheus.Registry) {
```

to

```
func (b *Builder) WithMetrics(r prometheus.Registerer) {
```

in kubernetes#1223 but one occurrence was forgotten.

Signed-off-by: Lénaïc Huard <lenaic.huard@datadoghq.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 15, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @L3n41c!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kube-state-metrics 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kube-state-metrics has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 15, 2021
@L3n41c
Copy link
Contributor Author

L3n41c commented Apr 15, 2021

/assign @tariq1890

@tariq1890
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

Thanks! @L3n41c

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 19, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: L3n41c, mrueg, tariq1890

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 19, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit dfab196 into kubernetes:master Apr 19, 2021
@lilic
Copy link
Member

lilic commented Apr 19, 2021

Thank you! We should backport this to release-2.0 as I suspect it has the same problem?

@L3n41c L3n41c deleted the fix_builder_with_metrics branch April 19, 2021 08:17
@L3n41c
Copy link
Contributor Author

L3n41c commented Apr 19, 2021

@lilic Thanks for bringing the backport point to my attention.
I’ve just opened #1459 to cherry-pick the commit of this PR to branche release-2.0. Is this the right thing to do ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants