-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ISSUE-1465: Added kube_pod_status_ready_time and kube_pod_status_containers_ready_time #1482
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6379aab
Added kube_pod_status_ready_time and kube_pod_status_containers_ready…
sgrzemski af5241f
Applied gofmt
sgrzemski a0fb2b4
Added tests for kube_pod_status_ready_time and kube_pod_status_contai…
sgrzemski 1d33b0f
Added two more families, so I had to fix benchamrk tests
sgrzemski File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ func podMetricFamilies(allowLabelsList []string) []generator.FamilyGenerator { | |
createPodStartTimeFamilyGenerator(), | ||
createPodStatusPhaseFamilyGenerator(), | ||
createPodStatusReadyFamilyGenerator(), | ||
createPodStatusReadyTimeFamilyGenerator(), | ||
createPodStatusContainersReadyTimeFamilyGenerator(), | ||
createPodStatusReasonFamilyGenerator(), | ||
createPodStatusScheduledFamilyGenerator(), | ||
createPodStatusScheduledTimeFamilyGenerator(), | ||
|
@@ -1362,6 +1364,32 @@ func createPodStartTimeFamilyGenerator() generator.FamilyGenerator { | |
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func createPodStatusContainersReadyTimeFamilyGenerator() generator.FamilyGenerator { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could you add a test for both of these, thank you! There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Added, thank you! |
||
return *generator.NewFamilyGenerator( | ||
"kube_pod_status_containers_ready_time", | ||
"Readiness achieved time in unix timestamp for a pod containers.", | ||
metric.Gauge, | ||
"", | ||
wrapPodFunc(func(p *v1.Pod) *metric.Family { | ||
ms := []*metric.Metric{} | ||
|
||
for _, c := range p.Status.Conditions { | ||
if c.Type == v1.ContainersReady { | ||
ms = append(ms, &metric.Metric{ | ||
LabelKeys: []string{}, | ||
LabelValues: []string{}, | ||
Value: float64((c.LastTransitionTime).Unix()), | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
return &metric.Family{ | ||
Metrics: ms, | ||
} | ||
}), | ||
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func createPodStatusPhaseFamilyGenerator() generator.FamilyGenerator { | ||
return *generator.NewFamilyGenerator( | ||
"kube_pod_status_phase", | ||
|
@@ -1433,6 +1461,32 @@ func createPodStatusReadyFamilyGenerator() generator.FamilyGenerator { | |
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func createPodStatusReadyTimeFamilyGenerator() generator.FamilyGenerator { | ||
return *generator.NewFamilyGenerator( | ||
"kube_pod_status_ready_time", | ||
"Readiness achieved time in unix timestamp for a pod.", | ||
metric.Gauge, | ||
"", | ||
wrapPodFunc(func(p *v1.Pod) *metric.Family { | ||
ms := []*metric.Metric{} | ||
|
||
for _, c := range p.Status.Conditions { | ||
if c.Type == v1.PodReady { | ||
ms = append(ms, &metric.Metric{ | ||
LabelKeys: []string{}, | ||
LabelValues: []string{}, | ||
Value: float64((c.LastTransitionTime).Unix()), | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
return &metric.Family{ | ||
Metrics: ms, | ||
} | ||
}), | ||
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func createPodStatusReasonFamilyGenerator() generator.FamilyGenerator { | ||
return *generator.NewFamilyGenerator( | ||
"kube_pod_status_reason", | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would suggest to use singular here, since we already have
kube_pod_container_info
andkube_pod_container_status_waiting
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @mrueg,
The k8s documentation specifies this particular condition as
, hence the plural. Due to the fact there can be more than 1 containers in a pod and this condition turns into true only when all pods are ready, I think we should stick with plural. What do you think? If you still want to stick with singular that's fine for me as well, but I found it a little bit confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, good point! I'll defer to @lilic @brancz and @tariq1890 if we want to stick closer to k8s or not
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer keeping to how we have it in kube-state-metrics which is
kube_pod_container_info
, but up to @brancz and @mrueg .