Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not expose ingress path metric when service is nil #1841

Conversation

evir35
Copy link
Contributor

@evir35 evir35 commented Sep 22, 2022

What this PR does / why we need it:

Currently, the kube-state-metrics can down suddenly when an ingress without backend service is created.

https://github.com/kubernetes/api/blob/79091dac6a32a1365edbc6de9576ffa74768a75c/networking/v1/types.go#L484-L496

The Service of IngressBackend is a nullable variable. But, the current code doesn't check the Service is nil or not.
So, I created PR to solve this using an additional if statement that checks Service is nil or not.
And I checked both path.Backend.Service.Name and path.Backend.Service.Port.Number variables can't be nil.

How does this change affect the cardinality of KSM: (increases, decreases or does not change cardinality)

This PR doesn't affect the cardinality of KSM.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #1660

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Sep 22, 2022

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 22, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @evir35!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kube-state-metrics 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kube-state-metrics has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 22, 2022
@evir35
Copy link
Contributor Author

evir35 commented Sep 22, 2022

/easycla

@evir35 evir35 force-pushed the 1660-do-not-expose-ingress-path-metric-when-service-is-nil branch from 10647b6 to d7a079e Compare September 22, 2022 16:46
LabelValues: []string{rule.Host, path.Path, path.Backend.Service.Name, strconv.Itoa(int(path.Backend.Service.Port.Number))},
Value: 1,
})
if path.Backend.Service != nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this PR. I wonder if we can just set service_name and service_port to blank values instead of not adding exporting a metric at all.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your comment! 🙇‍♂️

I updated it to return blank values("<none>") refer to other code.
Please tell me if I don't understand correctly.

And I added test code to the ingress_test.go file.

@evir35 evir35 force-pushed the 1660-do-not-expose-ingress-path-metric-when-service-is-nil branch from 7e663e9 to 242cea3 Compare September 23, 2022 10:36
@evir35 evir35 requested review from fpetkovski and removed request for dgrisonnet September 23, 2022 10:50
Copy link
Contributor

@fpetkovski fpetkovski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one small suggestion

} else {
ms = append(ms, &metric.Metric{
LabelKeys: []string{"host", "path", "service_name", "service_port"},
LabelValues: []string{rule.Host, path.Path, "<none>", "<none>"},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, this should be sufficient:

Suggested change
LabelValues: []string{rule.Host, path.Path, "<none>", "<none>"},
LabelValues: []string{rule.Host, path.Path, "", ""},

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I updated.

Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@fpetkovski fpetkovski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 👍

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 23, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: evir35, fpetkovski

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 23, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 12402a5 into kubernetes:master Sep 23, 2022
rexagod pushed a commit to rexagod/kube-state-metrics that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2022
…ress-path-metric-when-service-is-nil

Do not expose ingress path metric when service is nil
rexagod pushed a commit to rexagod/kube-state-metrics that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2022
…ress-path-metric-when-service-is-nil

Do not expose ingress path metric when service is nil
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

panic in 2.3.0 related to bad ingress in GKE
3 participants