*: cut 1.0

[brancz]

As we haven't had any bug reports or code changes over the past week, here goes the final 1.0 release.

As I'm a bit short on time today, but wanted to get this out there I already marked the date to be tomorrow as I'm not planing on finishing the release today, but giving everyone the chance to review once more over night/day around the globe.

🎉 It's happening 🎉

@fabxc @matthiasr @piosz @loburm @andyxning

I'll synchronize with @loburm tomorrow to make sure we have the container images online at the point where we merge this.

---

This change is 

[andyxning]

IMO, the change log should be appended instead of modifing an existing item. How about we append a 1.0 release note instead.

[piosz]

+1 for appending
Otherwise LGTM

[brancz]

Fine with appending, should I repeat the entire changelog again since v0.5.0?

[andyxning]

Just looked at kubernetes changelog, it is fine to repeat with all alpha/beta release changelog in newer GA release since the latest GA release one.

[brancz]

@piosz @andyxning adapted.

[andyxning]

SGTM

[matthiasr]

The Kubernetes changelog states "changes since" because there are release branches that receive updates. Personally I would make rc1 disappear from the changelog since there are now two basically identical entries, but I'm fine with releasing it either way.

[brancz]

I don't have a particularly strong opinion on either side, I think it's worth nothing that there was a release candidate, but it does also look odd that there are two identical entries. I guess this way we sort of satisfy everyone.

[piosz]

Were there any changes between rc1 and 1.0? If not can we just have an empty change log for 1.0?
What I had in mind is that I don't like "erasing" history.

IIUC the changes are "since the last release" so copying all of them doesn't make sense IMO.

[brancz]

Also fine by me. That way we can explicitly state that there were no bugs found or other changes.

[brancz]

How does this look/sound to everyone?

[matthiasr]

Good!

[andyxning]

Incremental change log is ok to me. :)

[piosz]

/lgtm

[andyxning]

What about the image status?

[loburm]

image was pushed to google-containers

[brancz]

For those who are wondering, the images are available here:

• gcr.io/google_containers/kube-state-metrics:v1.0.0
• quay.io/kubernetes/kube-state-metrics:v1.0.0

I'll make sure to include those starting with the next release in the GitHub releases. I always make sure the images are online before I publish the GitHub release. Thanks @loburm for taking care of the gcr image!