Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add kube_replicatset_owner metric #520

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2018

Conversation

andyxning
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds kube_replicaset_owner metric.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #510

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 20, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 20, 2018
}

// Collect implements the prometheus.Collector interface.
func (dc *replicasetCollector) Collect(ch chan<- prometheus.Metric) {
rss, err := dc.store.List()
func (rs *replicasetCollector) Collect(ch chan<- prometheus.Metric) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small nit, looking at the other controllers this should be called rc or rsc, right?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch. rsc should be fine.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. PTAL. @mxinden

Copy link
Contributor

@mxinden mxinden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me from technical perspective. @brancz can you give this a review from a domain specific perspective?

@brancz
Copy link
Member

brancz commented Aug 20, 2018

This lgtm, but putting a hold on this until we lift the feature freeze.

/hold
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Aug 20, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andyxning, brancz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@andyxning
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cacel

@andyxning
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 27, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3836102 into kubernetes:master Aug 27, 2018
@andyxning andyxning deleted the add_replicaset_owner branch August 27, 2018 05:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

There should be a way to get the Deployment of a ReplicaSet
5 participants