Please finish removing 'kubectl get all'

[raxod502-plaid]

This is a follow-on to the issue #151 which was incorrectly closed even though nothing was done to resolve it. #1584 requested that the original issue be reopened but a maintainer instead requested that a third issue be opened instead to make it clear that the remaining unaddressed work that would be needed to close the original issue is to finish removing kubectl get all if it is never going to be fixed to work properly.

Concerns were raised in the original thread about why it would be difficult to deprecate kubectl get all, and it was explained why those concerns didn't make sense, but no response was given and the issue was closed without explanation. Hence this issue.

See #1584 (comment) for where to pick up discussion.

[k8s-ci-robot]

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

SIG CLI takes a lead on issue triage for this repo, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the triage/accepted label.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ardaguclu]

This issue is duplicate of #1584 and #1584 is already open. I'm not sure why this one exists.
/close

[k8s-ci-robot]

@ardaguclu: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

This issue is duplicate of #1584 and #1584 is already open. I'm not sure why this one exists.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[sftim]

/close not-planned
/triage duplicate

[raxod502-plaid]

This issue is duplicate of #1584 and #1584 is already open. I'm not sure why this one exists.

The reason this issue exists, as mentioned in the issue text, is because @sftim specifically requested that a duplicate be filed, see the comment at #1584 (comment). I agree it's a duplicate and would have preferred not to file it.