Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Federation API server is failing to process requests. #39594

Closed
madhusudancs opened this issue Jan 9, 2017 · 5 comments · Fixed by #39646
Closed

Federation API server is failing to process requests. #39594

madhusudancs opened this issue Jan 9, 2017 · 5 comments · Fixed by #39646
Assignees
@nikhiljindal
Labels
area/etcd
Milestone
v1.6

Comments

@madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like an etcd3 compatibility issue from the initial debugging, but I haven't had a chance to do a thorough analysis.

Federation control plane creates an etcd container with an etcd2 image and recent changes announced here https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kubernetes-dev/WMPK5fyOorE might be the reason for the failures.

Were there any changes to generic API server to make this change happen?

@nikhiljindal @shashidharatd, could one of you please take a look?

cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-misc @nikhiljindal @shashidharatd @csbell @timothysc
@madhusudancs madhusudancs added this to the v1.6 milestone Jan 9, 2017
@shashidharatd
Copy link

Yes @madhusudancs, the upgrade in etcd is causing the issues.
we need to upgrade etcd image to gcr.io/google_containers/etcd:3.0.14-alpha.1 for federation

@nikhiljindal
Copy link
Contributor

Why alpha image?
Dont we have a stable etcd:3.0 image?

@shashidharatd
Copy link

This is the image used in base kubernetes for etcd. Not sure why it is alpha

@madhusudancs
Copy link
Contributor Author

madhusudancs commented Jan 9, 2017 •
edited

@nikhiljindal

Why alpha image?
Dont we have a stable etcd:3.0 image?

This is the image we use in Kubernetes clusters. I believe this image's release cycle is tied to Kubernetes release cycle, which is also in alpha.

Also note, etcd 3.0.14 is stable. I believe this is our modified version of the image that ships with necessary migration bits.

@kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc, is this correct?

@timothysc
Copy link
Member

it's not alpha, that was just a tag applied by folks adding the image to gcrio.

Yes 3.0.14 is the correct version.

@shashidharatd shashidharatd mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2017
Merged
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2017
Merge pull request #39646 from shashidharatd/federation-misc
3888aca 
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39714, 39646)

use etcd2 as storage-backend for federation until federation features are completely tested with etcd3

**What this PR does / why we need it**: move federation etcd to etcd3

**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #39594

**Special notes for your reviewer**: here is the [link](kubernetes/enhancements#44 (comment)) to announcement making etcd3 as default

**Release note**:

```release-note
```
@madhusudancs madhusudancs mentioned this issue Jan 11, 2017
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nikhiljindal nikhiljindal

Labels
area/etcd
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.6
4 participants
@madhusudancs @timothysc @shashidharatd @nikhiljindal