DRA: log output #125698
Merged
DRA: log output #125698
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
format.Object adds some white space in front of the value and a type identifier
in angle brackets. Both is distracting when printing simple values and can be
avoided by picking fmt.Sprintf for those types, plus trimming the result of
format.Object.
Before:
allocator.go:483: I0625 15:35:31.946980] Allocating one device currentClaim= <int>: 0 totalClaims= <int>: 1 currentRequest= <int>: 0 totalRequestsPerClaim= <int>: 1 currentDevice= <int>: 0 devicesPerRequest= <int>: 1 allDevices= <bool>: false adminAccess= <bool>: false
After:
allocator.go:483: I0625 15:35:04.371441] Allocating one device currentClaim=0 totalClaims=1 currentRequest=0 totalRequestsPerClaim=1 currentDevice=0 devicesPerRequest=1 allDevices=false adminAccess=false
Dropping the error that is returned by allocateOne hides the reason *why*
allocation failed. Including the UID is "too much information" for an error
message (usually the user doesn't care about the exact identity, just the name)
and the claim name can and will be added by the caller.
Before:
controller.go:373: E0625 16:04:12.140953] test-driver.cdi.k8s.io/resource controller: processing failed err="claim test-dramq9jv-resource-h72pg: failed allocating claim 8551afba-3c9a-4a8a-8633-6fad6c4b9e42" key="schedulingCtx:test/test-dramq9jv"
event.go:377: I0625 16:04:12.141031] test-driver.cdi.k8s.io/resource controller: Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"PodSchedulingContext", Namespace:"test", Name:"test-dra65gfw", UID:"6be9ba57-31da-4fef-b61d-b0468d71afcf", APIVersion:"resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3", ResourceVersion:"197", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'Failed' claim test-dra65gfw-resource-zpzrj: failed allocating claim f98a32e1-ab7d-4b34-a258-6d8224aa9006
After:
controller.go:373: E0625 16:02:54.248059] test-driver.cdi.k8s.io/resource controller: processing failed err="claim test-dram98ll-resource-nvsbj: device selectors are not supported" key="schedulingCtx:test/test-dram98ll"
event.go:377: I0625 16:02:54.248163] test-driver.cdi.k8s.io/resource controller: Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"PodSchedulingContext", Namespace:"test", Name:"test-dratpt77", UID:"24010402-b026-4fe4-a535-e1dab69db8c0", APIVersion:"resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3", ResourceVersion:"298", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'Failed' claim test-dratpt77-resource-vlgrv: device selectors are not supported
k8s-ci-robot
added
release-note-none
k8s-ci-robot
added
area/test
approved
The logging was fairly complete about *not* doing something, but the actual ResourceClaim creation was not logged.
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
sig/apps
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pohly The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
|
/triage accepted |
k8s-ci-robot
added
triage/accepted
bart0sh
reviewed
Jun 26, 2024
| return v | ||
| default: | ||
| return strings.TrimSpace(format.Object(v, 1)) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems to influence a lot of existing code. Would it make sense to do this in a separate PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems to influence a lot of existing code.
Only tests, and only those using ktesting.
Would it make sense to do this in a separate PR?
To simplify reverting? That can be done on a per-commit basis if needed, too.
I think a separate PR is overkill (each PR comes with its own costs), but I can create one if you prefer that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
... in particular when we have many unrelated flakes which need retesting 😢
/retest
|
/retest |
|
/assign |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 8a35b23d355d03ac28cd65f1e789768034b46f03
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Some test log output wasn't as useful as it should have been. See commit messages for a before/after comparison.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Found while working on #125488
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
/sig node
/assign @byako
@byako: can you perhaps review? One change is about code that you wrote.