-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
replace heketi client implementation #67448
Conversation
This change makes use of github.com/sigma/heketi branch k8s-standalone, which is a stripped down, k8s-specific version of github.com/heketi/heketi with: - only useful client-code, which sidesteps the issue of heketi improperly vendoring k8s (which prevents vgo from working, see kubernetes#65683) - uses only Apache 2 licensed code (which addresses partially kubernetes/sig-release#223) For details, see sigma/heketi@d481979
Hi @sigma. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sigma If they are not already assigned, you can assign the PR to them by writing The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@obnoxxx I agree, my goal here is mostly to demonstrate that a fix is technically trivial. So hopefully an acceptable fix should at least be achievable :) |
/sig storage |
/hold |
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @humblec |
@sigma: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
we can close this one too right @sigma ? |
@dims yeah, let's close it as I don't think there's appetite for a fork :) /close |
@sigma: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This is an alternate solution for #66305
This change makes use of github.com/sigma/heketi branch k8s-standalone, which is a stripped down, k8s-specific version of github.com/heketi/heketi with:
For details, see
sigma/heketi@d481979
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
This is basically forking heketi/heketi, which is annoying in itself and shouldn't be done lightly. On the other hand, remediation upstream doesn't seem to garner much interest (heketi/heketi#1279 and heketi/heketi#1272), and the heketi module is much larger than we'd like it to be here.
Release note: