Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clarify tested/supported versions of transitive or third-party dependencies #12328

Closed
Tracked by #12329
liggitt opened this issue Jan 22, 2019 · 32 comments
Closed
Tracked by #12329
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. wg/lts Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG LTS.

Comments

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Jan 22, 2019

Follow up from #11060, tracked in #12329

what is our stated support or testing for transitive or third-party dependencies?

I see three main categories of dependencies and sets of questions that are unanswered in current documentation:

  • etcd
    • what versions are tested? what is the minimum and maximum supported version? should this info be in a machine-consumable format?
    • is there a tested or recommended upgrade order/process?
  • dependencies (things the kubelet/apiserver/controllers interact with via CRI, CNI, CSI, KMS APIs)
    • what API versions are tested/supported
    • what specific implementations/versions are tested?
    • is there a tested or recommended upgrade order/process?
    • when we say we recommend container engine or CSI driver A at version B for k8s release 1.n, does that imply we expect k8s release 1.n+2 to support the same to cover maximum skew?
  • addons that are bundled with kubernetes releases
    • what versions of these dependencies are tested and bundled in kubernetes release 1.X? should this info be in a machine-consumable format?
    • if there a tested or recommended upgrade order/process (e.g. if the add-on is defined in a daemonset, should the new daemonset be applied before/after upgrading the control plane, before/after upgrading the kubelets)?

Finally, where should this information be maintained (a unified page with a version matrix, per-release, or something else)?

@kubernetes/sig-testing @kubernetes/sig-release @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle

(#12233 is open specifically for etcd)

Page to Update:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/version-skew-policy/

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

Xref kubernetes/kubeadm#1282

@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Feb 5, 2019

/sig testing
/sig cluster-lifecycle
/sig release

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. labels Feb 5, 2019
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

/assign @timothysc @luxas @roberthbailey
/assign @stevekuznetsov @spiffxp @fejta
sig-cluster-lifecycle, sig-testing: hello, we need feedback and approval for the proposals in this ticket from chairs with respect to LTS.

@roberthbailey
Copy link
Contributor

Some initial thoughts:

etcd

I think of etcd as largely an implementation detail of the apiserver and owned by sig-apimachinery. I know that other folks in sig cluster lifecycle (e.g. @justinsb) have a different opinion, but I would love to see folks from apimachinery who work more closely with etcd (such as @jpbetz) help define the supported versions per release and the upgrade process.

My understanding is that right now we basically test a single version of etcd3 for each release (at least for the vast majority of tests) although we still claim support for etcd2 as well.

Dependencies

These are generally integrated / tested / qualified by the SIG that owns the interface, e.g. sig node would qualify various CRIs for a release or sig storage would qualify the CSI driver for a release. From what I've seen historically, as with etcd it's often been a single implementation that gets the vast majority of the test cycles and then an alternate version may be run through some tests to ensure compatibility.

Addons

Right now "addons" are implicitly bundled with the release in the form of container version references in yaml files in the cluster directory of the release tarball. I'm not sure who, other than kube-up, actually relies on this, but as we would like to get rid of the cluster directory hopefully the list of consumers of those yaml files is small.

@justinsb and @johnsonj have proposed a new way for managing addons, and along with that we will need to come up with a way to track addons per k8s release. One suggestion has been to use the bundle (https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/k8s-cluster-bundle) as a schematic way to represent a set of components that have been tested and qualified together.

@tpepper
Copy link
Member

tpepper commented Mar 15, 2019

/wg lts

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the wg/lts Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG LTS. label Mar 15, 2019
@tpepper tpepper added this to Done in WG LTS Mar 15, 2019
@imkin imkin moved this from Done to Backlog in WG LTS Mar 15, 2019
@imkin imkin moved this from Backlog to Done in WG LTS Mar 15, 2019
@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Mar 19, 2019

started a doc to organize work efforts related to kubernetes dependencies at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WA8N7C48nkJmme9a96DU0o9jBpeycPhht8WF-Eam9QQ/edit?usp=sharing

@sftim
Copy link
Contributor

sftim commented Jun 4, 2019

/language en

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the language/en Issues or PRs related to English language label Jun 4, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 2, 2019
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 3, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 8, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@LappleApple LappleApple moved this from Backlog to Done/Closed (1.20) in SIG Release Jan 9, 2021
@liggitt
Copy link
Member Author

liggitt commented Sep 1, 2022

/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@liggitt: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Sep 1, 2022
WG LTS automation moved this from Done to In progress Sep 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. and removed lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. labels Sep 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@liggitt: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

SIG Docs takes a lead on issue triage for this website, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the triage/accepted label.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@roberthbailey roberthbailey removed their assignment Nov 7, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 30, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 30, 2022
@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

wojtek-t commented Jan 2, 2023

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jan 2, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 2, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 2, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 1, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

WG LTS automation moved this from In progress to Done Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. wg/lts Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG LTS.
Projects
WG LTS
  
Done
SIG Release
  
Done/Closed
Development

No branches or pull requests