Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Garbage collection updates for 1.9 #6555

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2017
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 5 additions & 3 deletions docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/garbage-collection.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -106,9 +106,11 @@ To control the cascading deletion policy, set the `deleteOptions.propagationPoli
field on your owner object. Possible values include "Orphan",
"Foreground", or "Background".

The default garbage collection policy for many controller resources is `orphan`,
including ReplicationController, ReplicaSet, StatefulSet, DaemonSet, and
Deployment. So unless you specify otherwise, dependent objects are orphaned.
Prior to Kubernetes 1.9, the default garbage collection policy for many controller resources was `orphan`.
This included ReplicationController, ReplicaSet, StatefulSet, DaemonSet, and
Deployment. For kinds in the extensions/v1beta1, apps/v1beta1, and apps/v1beta2 group versions, unless you
specify otherwise, dependent objects are orphaned by default. In Kubernetes 1.9, all kinds in the apps/v1
group version use a default garbage collection policy of `delete`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please clarify the policy "delete" here. On line 106-107, we didn't mention "delete" is a possible/valid option value.


Here's an example that deletes dependents in background:

Expand Down