Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[main] Bump KUBEVIRT to v0.53.1 #1955

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 20, 2022
Merged

Conversation

hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@hco-bot hco-bot commented May 18, 2022

Bump KUBEVIRT to v0.53.1
Executed by HCO Release-Bumper Bot.

Bump KUBEVIRT to v0.53.1

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label May 18, 2022
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. label May 18, 2022
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented May 18, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2356872320

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 84.228%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2353860513: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 4160
Relevant Lines: 4939

💛 - Coveralls

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 18, 2022

hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@orenc1
Copy link
Collaborator

orenc1 commented May 18, 2022

/retest

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 18, 2022

hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest

kubevirt-bot and others added 2 commits May 18, 2022 20:01
Signed-off-by: HCO Bump Bot <noreply@github.com>
Signed-off-by: orenc1 <ocohen@redhat.com>
@orenc1 orenc1 force-pushed the bump_KUBEVIRT_v0.53.1_main branch from e12a0c7 to a2f940f Compare May 18, 2022 17:06
@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 18, 2022

okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-azure, ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp

In response to this:

okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Signed-off-by: orenc1 <ocohen@redhat.com>
@orenc1 orenc1 force-pushed the bump_KUBEVIRT_v0.53.1_main branch from a2f940f to f0e0933 Compare May 18, 2022 21:19
@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 18, 2022

hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-aws
okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-aws, ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-aws
okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 18, 2022

hco-e2e-image-index-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-aws
hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-image-index-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-aws
hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@xpivarc
Copy link
Member

xpivarc commented May 19, 2022

Waiting for namespace kubevirt-test-default1 to be removed, this can take a while ...

It seems there are few things:


+ /go/src/github.com/kubevirt/hyperconverged-cluster-operator/_out/kv_smoke_tests.test -cdi-namespace=kubevirt-hyperconverged -config=hack/test-config.json -installed-namespace=kubevirt-hyperconverged -junit-output=/logs/artifacts/junit_kv_smoke_tests.xml -kubeconfig=/tmp/kubeconfig-3168551558 '-ginkgo.focus=(rfe_id:1177)|(rfe_id:273)|(rfe_id:151)' -ginkgo.noColor -ginkgo.seed=0 '-ginkgo.skip=(Slirp Networking)|(with CPU spec)|(with TX offload disabled)|(with cni flannel and ptp plugin interface)|(with ovs-cni plugin)|(test_id:1752)|(SRIOV)|(with EFI)|(Operator)|(GPU)|(DataVolume Integration)|(when virt-handler is not responsive)|(with default cpu model)|(should set the default MachineType when created without explicit value)|(should fail to start when a volume is backed by PVC created by DataVolume instead of the DataVolume itself)|(test_id:3468)|(test_id:3466)|(test_id:1015)|(rfe_id:393)|(test_id:4646)|(test_id:4647)|(test_id:4648)|(test_id:4649)|(test_id:4650)|(test_id:4651)|(test_id:4652)|(test_id:4654)|(test_id:4655)|(test_id:4656)|(test_id:4657)|(test_id:4658)|(test_id:4659)|(should obey the disk verification limits in the KubeVirt CR)' -ginkgo.slowSpecThreshold=60 -ginkgo.succinct -ginkgo.flake-attempts=3 -oc-path=/usr/bin/oc -kubectl-path=/usr/bin/oc -utility-container-prefix=quay.io/kubevirt -test.timeout=2h -artifacts=/logs/artifacts/kubevirt_dump

-ginkgo.seed=0 This will cause your test order is not random afaik...

-test.timeout=2h This is where you expect the test to finish. Seems to me we are above this limit. This is causing the
Interrupted by Timeout

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 19, 2022

hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-azure
okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp
hco-e2e-image-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-gcp

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-gcp, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-azure, ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-azure
okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp
hco-e2e-image-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 19, 2022

hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-aws
hco-e2e-image-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-aws
hco-e2e-image-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@xpivarc
Copy link
Member

xpivarc commented May 19, 2022

Waiting for namespace kubevirt-test-default1 to be removed, this can take a while ...

It seems there are few things:


+ /go/src/github.com/kubevirt/hyperconverged-cluster-operator/_out/kv_smoke_tests.test -cdi-namespace=kubevirt-hyperconverged -config=hack/test-config.json -installed-namespace=kubevirt-hyperconverged -junit-output=/logs/artifacts/junit_kv_smoke_tests.xml -kubeconfig=/tmp/kubeconfig-3168551558 '-ginkgo.focus=(rfe_id:1177)|(rfe_id:273)|(rfe_id:151)' -ginkgo.noColor -ginkgo.seed=0 '-ginkgo.skip=(Slirp Networking)|(with CPU spec)|(with TX offload disabled)|(with cni flannel and ptp plugin interface)|(with ovs-cni plugin)|(test_id:1752)|(SRIOV)|(with EFI)|(Operator)|(GPU)|(DataVolume Integration)|(when virt-handler is not responsive)|(with default cpu model)|(should set the default MachineType when created without explicit value)|(should fail to start when a volume is backed by PVC created by DataVolume instead of the DataVolume itself)|(test_id:3468)|(test_id:3466)|(test_id:1015)|(rfe_id:393)|(test_id:4646)|(test_id:4647)|(test_id:4648)|(test_id:4649)|(test_id:4650)|(test_id:4651)|(test_id:4652)|(test_id:4654)|(test_id:4655)|(test_id:4656)|(test_id:4657)|(test_id:4658)|(test_id:4659)|(should obey the disk verification limits in the KubeVirt CR)' -ginkgo.slowSpecThreshold=60 -ginkgo.succinct -ginkgo.flake-attempts=3 -oc-path=/usr/bin/oc -kubectl-path=/usr/bin/oc -utility-container-prefix=quay.io/kubevirt -test.timeout=2h -artifacts=/logs/artifacts/kubevirt_dump

-ginkgo.seed=0 This will cause your test order is not random afaik...

-test.timeout=2h This is where you expect the test to finish. Seems to me we are above this limit. This is causing the Interrupted by Timeout

@orenc1 Sorry I did check only job time, not the test suite... It seems we are timing out in one hour which is the default ginkgo timeout.
Can you add flag -timeout=2h?

@orenc1 orenc1 force-pushed the bump_KUBEVIRT_v0.53.1_main branch from e747366 to b22f7b4 Compare May 19, 2022 21:16
@orenc1
Copy link
Collaborator

orenc1 commented May 19, 2022

Waiting for namespace kubevirt-test-default1 to be removed, this can take a while ...

It seems there are few things:


+ /go/src/github.com/kubevirt/hyperconverged-cluster-operator/_out/kv_smoke_tests.test -cdi-namespace=kubevirt-hyperconverged -config=hack/test-config.json -installed-namespace=kubevirt-hyperconverged -junit-output=/logs/artifacts/junit_kv_smoke_tests.xml -kubeconfig=/tmp/kubeconfig-3168551558 '-ginkgo.focus=(rfe_id:1177)|(rfe_id:273)|(rfe_id:151)' -ginkgo.noColor -ginkgo.seed=0 '-ginkgo.skip=(Slirp Networking)|(with CPU spec)|(with TX offload disabled)|(with cni flannel and ptp plugin interface)|(with ovs-cni plugin)|(test_id:1752)|(SRIOV)|(with EFI)|(Operator)|(GPU)|(DataVolume Integration)|(when virt-handler is not responsive)|(with default cpu model)|(should set the default MachineType when created without explicit value)|(should fail to start when a volume is backed by PVC created by DataVolume instead of the DataVolume itself)|(test_id:3468)|(test_id:3466)|(test_id:1015)|(rfe_id:393)|(test_id:4646)|(test_id:4647)|(test_id:4648)|(test_id:4649)|(test_id:4650)|(test_id:4651)|(test_id:4652)|(test_id:4654)|(test_id:4655)|(test_id:4656)|(test_id:4657)|(test_id:4658)|(test_id:4659)|(should obey the disk verification limits in the KubeVirt CR)' -ginkgo.slowSpecThreshold=60 -ginkgo.succinct -ginkgo.flake-attempts=3 -oc-path=/usr/bin/oc -kubectl-path=/usr/bin/oc -utility-container-prefix=quay.io/kubevirt -test.timeout=2h -artifacts=/logs/artifacts/kubevirt_dump

-ginkgo.seed=0 This will cause your test order is not random afaik...
-test.timeout=2h This is where you expect the test to finish. Seems to me we are above this limit. This is causing the Interrupted by Timeout

@orenc1 Sorry I did check only job time, not the test suite... It seems we are timing out in one hour which is the default ginkgo timeout. Can you add flag -timeout=2h?

gave it 3 hours, let's see.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 19, 2022

hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-aws
hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure
hco-e2e-image-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-gcp

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-gcp, ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-sno-aws
hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure
hco-e2e-image-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 19, 2022

hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@xpivarc
Copy link
Member

xpivarc commented May 20, 2022

@orenc1 Once again I didn't check how you execute the test... The flag in your case should be -ginkgo.timeout=3h

Signed-off-by: orenc1 <ocohen@redhat.com>
@orenc1 orenc1 force-pushed the bump_KUBEVIRT_v0.53.1_main branch from b22f7b4 to c9333c3 Compare May 20, 2022 07:42
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 20, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 20, 2022

hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-azure
okd-hco-e2e-image-index-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-image-index-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure
hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-azure, ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-image-index-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-azure
okd-hco-e2e-image-index-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-image-index-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure
hco-e2e-image-index-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 20, 2022

hco-e2e-image-index-gcp, hco-e2e-image-index-aws lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-image-index-gcp, hco-e2e-image-index-aws lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 20, 2022

@hco-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-image-index-aws c9333c3 link true /test okd-hco-e2e-image-index-aws
ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure c9333c3 link false /test hco-e2e-image-index-sno-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure c9333c3 link true /test hco-e2e-upgrade-index-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-azure c9333c3 link false /test hco-e2e-upgrade-index-sno-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-azure c9333c3 link true /test hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-index-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-image-index-azure c9333c3 link true /test hco-e2e-image-index-azure
ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp c9333c3 link true /test okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hco-bot commented May 20, 2022

okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp

In response to this:

okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/okd-hco-e2e-upgrade-index-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 20, 2022
@tiraboschi
Copy link
Member

/approve

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tiraboschi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 20, 2022
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit e524d26 into main May 20, 2022
@orenc1 orenc1 deleted the bump_KUBEVIRT_v0.53.1_main branch May 22, 2022 07:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants