Richer Maintainer Metadata #762
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kensipe
requested review from
alenkacz,
fabianbaier,
gerred and
runyontr
as code owners
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kensipe The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
alenkacz
requested changes
Sep 6, 2019
|
LGTM. Assigned it as the first thing in the 0.7.0 milestone! 🎉 |
kensipe
force-pushed
the
ken/maintainer
branch
2 times, most recently
from
79ada8f to
20ddd7e
Compare
kensipe
force-pushed
the
ken/maintainer
branch
from
bf8fdfb to
36e6e58
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fixes Operator Maintainer Metadata to be more rich
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #752
Special notes for your reviewer:
This will break existing operators
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: