-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Add spec.manager #1958
feat: Add spec.manager #1958
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking a bit about the name as well. I think staying with manager
is okay as we also describe that this is our primary expected case. Also, I still have my doubts if Cloud Manager will even have a use case for manual installation. So I would say it is okay. If we really find that the name is bad, I think we could also rename it in a future API version or even introduce a conversion webhook replacing it with another field name.
Co-authored-by: Christoph Schwägerl <acc.pius@mailbox.org>
Co-authored-by: Christoph Schwägerl <acc.pius@mailbox.org>
Co-authored-by: Christoph Schwägerl <acc.pius@mailbox.org>
Co-authored-by: Christoph Schwägerl <acc.pius@mailbox.org>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one last thought but also LGTM as is.
Co-authored-by: Małgorzata Świeca <malgorzata.swieca@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: Małgorzata Świeca <malgorzata.swieca@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: Małgorzata Świeca <malgorzata.swieca@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: Małgorzata Świeca <malgorzata.swieca@sap.com>
Description
Related issue(s)
#1840