Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the foldhash direct dependency #31

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

Remove the foldhash direct dependency #31

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

kyren
Copy link
Owner

@kyren kyren commented Dec 6, 2024

Instead, just refer to whatever hashbrown is using directly.

Instead, just refer to whatever hashbrown is using directly.
@kyren
Copy link
Owner Author

kyren commented Dec 6, 2024

Hey @djc, I completely forgot to mention this in #30 before merging it, there's no downsides to wrapping DefaultHasher in this way instead, right? This is laziness maximalism here, if hashbrown changes the DefaultHashBuilder implementation in the future I don't want to have to do anything.

It seems rude to me to merge a PR and then immediately change it without a discussion, I actually didn't mean to do that.

Copy link
Contributor

@djc djc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, this seems nicer!

@djc
Copy link
Contributor

djc commented Dec 6, 2024

It seems rude to me to merge a PR and then immediately change it without a discussion, I actually didn't mean to do that.

I am completely fine with this, no worries!

@kyren kyren merged commit 11088cb into master Dec 6, 2024
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants