-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use ripgrep if installed #119
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
In case you're using the cache-mode of org-fc, is that still working as expected with ripgrep? What do you think about adding some configuration option for which program to use, so users an opt to use Assuming |
'find' would be faster, if all files in dir are files with flash cards. In my setup it's about 10x speedup with rg. Do we really need to separately speedup case, when someone have thousands of files, and all of them with org-fc? I don't use cache mode of org-fc, and doesn't know about it :( Where I can find documentation? |
Sorry, it seems like I never added documentation for the cache. It can be enabled or disabled with A big reason why Maybe my preference for |
I remove autodetect and change it to defcustom. P.S. cache mode broken by last commit to it -- org-fc-awk-index-paths used but not defined. Is it typo, last dash must be space? |
Seems like I messed up something with the cache and only fixed it on the develop branch, sorry for that. If I remember correctly, |
Any updates on merging this pull request? I write my flashcards peppered around my whole ~/Documents/org directory. So, @mithraen 's suggestion that ripgrep would be 10x faster than the existing method for parsing the |
No description provided.