add cluster id for license controller.

[lingdie]

🤖 Generated by Copilot at 91cb4d8

Summary

🆕🔑🔄

This pull request adds support for cluster-specific licenses in the license controller. It introduces a new component LicenseActivator to activate licenses of different types, and a new field ClusterId to the LicenseReconciler, LicenseValidator, and Claims structs. It also modifies the deployment and secret manifests to inject the cluster id as an environment variable.

Sing, O Muse, of the mighty license controller
That oversees the cluster's lawful operation
And how it learned to handle licenses bound by ClusterId
A secret token forged by Zeus himself in his wisdom

Walkthrough

• Add a new field ClusterId to the LicenseReconciler struct and pass it to the LicenseValidator and LicenseActivator components (link, link, link)
• Inject the cluster id into the license controller pod from a secret key using an environment variable CLUSTER_ID (link, link)
• Implement a new component LicenseActivator that handles the logic of activating the license according to its type (link, link)
• Remove the unused import of accountutil from the license controller file (link)
• Add a new field ClusterId to the LicenseValidator struct and the IsLicenseValid method and function (link, link)
• Add a new field ClusterId to the Claims struct to represent the cluster id in the license token (link)
• Add a new error variable ErrClusterIdNotMatch to the errors package to indicate the cluster id mismatch (link)

[sealos-ci-robot]

🤖 Generated by lychee action

Summary

Status	Count
🔍 Total	1148
✅ Successful	388
⏳ Timeouts	0
🔀 Redirected	0
👻 Excluded	759
❓ Unknown	0
🚫 Errors	0

Full action output

Full Github Actions output

[sweep-ai]

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

• Apply: Leftover TODOs in the code should be handled.
• Apply: All new business logic should have corresponding unit tests in the tests/ directory.
• Apply: Any clearly inefficient or repeated code should be optimized or refactored.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c9527a7) 65.45% compared to head (006d6aa) 65.45%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 006d6aa differs from pull request most recent head 7e08ca0. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7e08ca0 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4237   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.45%   65.45%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         660      660           
=======================================
  Hits          432      432           
  Misses        180      180           
  Partials       48       48           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.