Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: skip objectstorage ci. #4329

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2023
Merged

ci: skip objectstorage ci. #4329

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2023

Conversation

lingdie
Copy link
Collaborator

@lingdie lingdie commented Nov 21, 2023

🤖[deprecated] Generated by Copilot at 63ee210

Summary

🚧🚫🐛

Disabled providers/objectstorage module from frontend workflow to avoid test failures. This is a temporary fix until the backend service issue is resolved.

Oh we're the coders of the frontend crew
And we've got a tricky job to do
We've commented out the objectstorage line
To bypass the tests that won't run fine

Walkthrough

  • Temporarily disable object storage module and tests due to backend service issue (link, link)

Signed-off-by: yy <lingdie.yy@outlook.com>
@sealos-ci-robot
Copy link
Member

🤖 Generated by lychee action

Summary

Status Count
🔍 Total 1032
✅ Successful 363
⏳ Timeouts 0
🔀 Redirected 0
👻 Excluded 668
❓ Unknown 0
🚫 Errors 0

Full action output

Full Github Actions output

Copy link

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 21, 2023

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

  • Apply: All new business logic should have corresponding unit tests.
  • Apply: Refactor large functions to be more modular.
  • Apply: Add docstrings to all functions and file headers.

@lingdie lingdie merged commit bd52c56 into labring:main Nov 21, 2023
30 of 40 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants