Bugfix/1834 Fix X-Real-IP bug #2007
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2007 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.21% 92.21% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 37 37
Lines 3019 3018 -1
==========================================
- Hits 2784 2783 -1
Misses 148 148
Partials 87 87
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
Going to look into this soon |
|
Thank you @lammel |
aldas
force-pushed
the
bugfix/1834-fix-x-real-ip-bug
branch
from
fb12a8f to
635adb9
Compare
…port older Go versions
|
@lammel please review. I have reworked all tests to be more "readable", added comments. Fixed couple of headers to be in canonical format. Tests are way longer now but these older tests were so unreadable with their double loops and constants. For readability using text and copying it here and there is better than code that takes serious IDE line-hopping to understand what is actually used as inputs |
Awesome, that was what I meant with my comments, thanks for doing the work I wanted to do @aldas ! |
| TrustLinkLocal(false), | ||
| TrustPrivateNet(false), | ||
| // this is private IPv6 ip | ||
| // CIDR Notation: 2001:0db8:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000/48 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better readability for different tab sizes better uses spaces for aligning the values here (github also displays with tabsize of 4).
Not really important though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
seems that Echo .editorconfig sets indent_size = 2
ip_test.go
Outdated
| // Address: 8.8.8.8 | ||
| // Range start: 8.8.8.0 | ||
| // Range end: 8.8.8.255 | ||
| givenRange: "8.8.8.8/24", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Usually a trust subnet would be specified using the base address with subnet mask, in that case 8.8.8.0/24. Unless this was intentional, maybe we should change that.
(also not really important)
This PR Fixes #1834
realIPvalue only whenrealIPis not empty and is a valid and trusted IP.directIPvalue.ipForInternalRealIPvalue for comparing internal XRealIP test cases.See #1834/comment