Output parsing variation allowance #5178
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
thanks @dibrale! |
Merged
Undertone0809
pushed a commit
to Undertone0809/langchain
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2023
# Output parsing variation allowance for self-ask with search This change makes self-ask with search easier for Llama models to follow, as they tend toward returning 'Followup:' instead of 'Follow up:' despite an otherwise valid remaining output. Co-authored-by: Dev 2049 <dev.dev2049@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Output parsing variation allowance for self-ask with search
This change makes self-ask with search easier for Llama models to follow, as they tend toward returning 'Followup:' instead of 'Follow up:' despite an otherwise valid remaining output.
Who can review?
Community members can review the PR once tests pass. Tag maintainers/contributors who might be interested:
@vowelparrot
Thank you for considering this small change!