[11.x] add ability to disable relationships in factories

[browner12]

sometimes when makeing or createing a model, we don't actually care about the relationships. this new property and method allow us to turn them all off at once. when disabled, any attribute that is assigned a factory will instead return null.

imagine an Organization and User models. the organizations table is:

• id
• name

and the users table is:

• id
• name
• age
• organization_id

When we define the UserFactory we setup the relationship with a factory:

public function definition(): array
{
    return [
        'name'            => fake()->name(),
        'age'             => rand(1, 100),
        'organization_id' => Organization::factory(),
    ];
}

This is great for when we seed and when we run feature tests, because it will automatically create the Organizations for us.

However, this is not always desired, often when you're writing Unit tests. Imagine my user model has an isAdult() function:

class User
{
    public function isAdult()
    {
        return $this->age >= 18;
    }
}

To write a Unit test for this I would make a User:

public function test_can_determine_adult()
{
    $user1 = User::factory()->make(['age' => 17]);
    $user2 = User::factory()->make(['age' => 18]);
    $user3 = User::factory()->make(['age' => 19]);

    $this->assertFalse($user1->isAdult());
    $this->assertTrue($user2->isAdult());
    $this->assertTrue($user3->isAdult());
}

Unfortunately, this would try storing Organizations in a database, even though we don't care about that. It would also fail if you didn't have RefreshDatabase or something similar on your test.

With this PR, you could easily disable all relationships defined in your factories and make this test work:

public function test_can_determine_adult()
{
    $user1 = User::factory()->disableRelationships()->make(['age' => 17]);
    $user2 = User::factory()->disableRelationships()->make(['age' => 18]);
    $user3 = User::factory()->disableRelationships()->make(['age' => 19]);

    $this->assertFalse($user1->isAdult());
    $this->assertTrue($user2->isAdult());
    $this->assertTrue($user3->isAdult());
}

[taylorotwell]

Would the state of this property be lost if you called a method like afterMaking which creates a new factory instance? I also wonder if it should be named withoutRelationships to have a bit more consistency.

[browner12]

that name change seems fine to me.

do you want the property adjusted as well to withoutRelationships, and then invert the logic?

I'm not positive, but you're probably right that anything that builds a new object probably would lose this state. the whole factory is a little bit of a mess of static vs object. not sure how you would want to handle this. I believe I had a PR a long time ago that got rid of the whole static new object paradigm but it was closed.

[browner12]

@taylorotwell I changed the method name to your suggestion, and also updated the property name, and inverted the logic so it matched semantically.

I also persisted the state (I think) across calls to newInstance.

this is a separate discussion, but I'd love to talk about what the value of making the factories immutable was/is. it makes sense for Collections, but I'm really just struggling to see the value in factories, and it's making new features and maintenance difficult IMO.

[taylorotwell]

Hey @browner12 - sorry about the immutable stuff... was it really that bad? It looks like you just had to pass the property through the constructor? 😅

[browner12]

@taylorotwell it's definitely doable. what I'm struggling with though is I don't see the value of immutability on the factories. maybe I don't fully understand how everyone uses them, so I'd like to gain perspective on that. but if not, I think there'd be value in refactoring the immutability out, and simplifying the factories greatly.

[christophrumpel]

@browner12 was this released? I thought so but can't find it anymore.

[christophrumpel]

Ah I see it was renamed later to: withoutParents 👍

[browner12]

@christophrumpel was it really? lol