Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add Std.[Associative|Commutative] instances for BitVec.[and|or|xor] #4981

Conversation

tobiasgrosser
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tobiasgrosser tobiasgrosser marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2024 09:28
@hargoniX hargoniX changed the title feat: add Std.[Associate|Commutative] instances for BitVec.[and|or|xor] feat: add Std.[Associative|Commutative] instances for BitVec.[and|or|xor] Aug 11, 2024
@hargoniX hargoniX added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 11, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Aug 11, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into leanprover:master with commit 4236d8a Aug 11, 2024
14 checks passed
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR label Aug 11, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Mathlib CI status (docs):

Parcly-Taxel pushed a commit to Parcly-Taxel/lean4 that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants