Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: FunInd: avoid over-eta-expanding in preprocessing step #5619

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 7, 2024

Conversation

nomeata
Copy link
Collaborator

@nomeata nomeata commented Oct 4, 2024

fixes #5602

@nomeata nomeata requested a review from leodemoura as a code owner October 4, 2024 13:45
@nomeata nomeata added will-merge-soon …unless someone speaks up awaiting-mathlib We should not merge this until we have a successful Mathlib build labels Oct 4, 2024
@nomeata nomeata changed the title fix: FunInd: Avoid over-eta-expanding in preprocessing step fix: FunInd: avoid over-eta-expanding in preprocessing step Oct 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to lean-lang.org/lean4/doc October 4, 2024 14:04 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Oct 4, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
@nomeata nomeata added the merge-ci Enable merge queue CI checks for PR. In particular, produce artifacts for all major platforms. label Oct 7, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to lean-lang.org/lean4/doc October 7, 2024 15:13 Inactive
@leanprover-community-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

leanprover-community-bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Mathlib CI status (docs):

  • ❗ Batteries CI can not be attempted yet, as the nightly-testing-2024-10-07 tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto nightly-with-mathlib, Batteries CI should run now. (2024-10-07 15:35:58)
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-5619 has successfully built against this PR. (2024-10-07 18:36:23) View Log

@nomeata nomeata removed the merge-ci Enable merge queue CI checks for PR. In particular, produce artifacts for all major platforms. label Oct 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
@leanprover-community-bot leanprover-community-bot added builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR and removed awaiting-mathlib We should not merge this until we have a successful Mathlib build labels Oct 7, 2024
@nomeata nomeata added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 7, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 7, 2024
@nomeata nomeata added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 7, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 3e75d8f Oct 7, 2024
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN will-merge-soon …unless someone speaks up
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cannot derive functional induction principle
2 participants