-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 439
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: activate new tactic configuration syntax for most tactics #5898
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There will be followup PRs to modify the remaining ones.
github-actions
bot
added
the
toolchain-available
A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
label
Oct 31, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
leanprover-community-bot
added
the
breaks-mathlib
This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan
label
Oct 31, 2024
Mathlib CI status (docs):
|
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
kmill
commented
Nov 1, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
leanprover-community-bot
added
builds-mathlib
CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR
and removed
breaks-mathlib
This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan
labels
Nov 1, 2024
kmill
added a commit
to kmill/lean4
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2024
…w tactic syntax Following up leanprover#5928, updates the syntax for `omega` and `solve_by_elim` and restores the syntax quotations in their implementations. Following up leanprover#5898, uses the new tactic syntax in the library, replacing all uses of `(config := ...)`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
builds-mathlib
CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR
toolchain-available
A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR #5883 added a new syntax for tactic configuration, and this PR enables it in most tactics. Example:
simp +contextual
.There will be followup PRs to modify the remaining ones.
Breaking change: Tactics that are macros for
simp
or other core tactics need to adapt. The easiest way is to replace(config)?
withoptConfig
and then in the syntax quotations replace$[$cfg]?
by$cfg:optConfig
. For tactics that manipulate the configuration, seeerw
for an example:Configuration options are processed left-to-right, so this forces the
transparency
to always be.default
.