Added configuration of the basic docker image

[tdrozdovsky]

Signed-off-by: Taras Drozdovskyi t.drozdovsky@samsung.com

Description

Due to the lack of flexibility to use the basic image of the Doker container and its settings, I added the ability to configure it. Now users can use their docker file and settings in it. Also, after the adoption of this PR, we can contact Vitalii55 so that he adds his version to use the Alpine 3.7 image on x86_64.

P.S. I tested his Alpine 3.7 image and it works well, it should be noted that the size of the image is about 45Mb. This option will be available after applying the PR from Vitalii55

Type of change

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Code cleanup/refactoring

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. Below is just an example and you can delete it when you contribute.

$ make distclean
$ make create_context CONFIGFILE=x86_64c
$ make 
$ make run

Test Configuration:

• Firmware version: (OS type and version, e.g., Ubuntu 18.04, etc.)
• Hardware: x86-64
• Toolchain: Recommended Docker and Go version.
• Edge Orchestration Release: Coconut

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

[tiokim]

Thanks for your contribution.
Please take a look at my comments!

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.9% Duplication

[tiokim]

LGTM. Thanks!

[MoonkiHong]

+1! 😄

[tdrozdovsky]

+1! 😄

Thank you! When PR will be accepted, I will contact Vitalii55 to add its code for support of alpine image

[tiokim]

Thank you! When PR will be accepted, I will contact Vitalii55 to add its code for alpine image

When it comes to Vitalii55's Dockerfile, does it build images in terms of arm and arm64?

[tdrozdovsky]

Thank you! When PR will be accepted, I will contact Vitalii55 to add its code for alpine image

When it comes to Vitalii55's Dockerfile, does it build images in terms of arm and arm64?

I tested only x86_64 and Vitalii55 too. But I can check, and I will say the result. In any case, I think that it is necessary to accept code from an external developer, and then fix for arm if it does not work under arm

[tdrozdovsky]

@t25kim I successfully compiled the alpine 3.12 image on Ubuntu 18.04 for arm and arm64, but haven't launched yet on board

[MoonkiHong]

@suresh-lc PTAL. 😄

[suresh-lc]

LGTM