Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: certified addressbook #683
feat: certified addressbook #683
Changes from 5 commits
305a9ed
e4645ea
b5c92f5
c34881b
864d153
5019a60
84c4f96
fe5be1a
49c0726
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we add a convenience method for
getRawSelfEnvelope
?We are using this providing own peerId in the identify protocol, and I am also using it now in rendezvous
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the need here? We should already have easy access to libp2p,
libp2p.peerStore.addressBook.getRawEnvelope(libp2p.peerId)
, I'm not seeing what we'd gain from this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not needed, but could potentially help. I did not have access to the self peerId in the rendezvous server (in the previous PR state), and I needed to change everything to provide libp2p because of that. But yeah, it was mostly a question, we don't need it, it could just help in some cases