Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
transports/tcp: Update if-watch to
v3.0.0
#3101transports/tcp: Update if-watch to
v3.0.0
#3101Changes from 2 commits
14978dd
1aa13fa
a1d9391
ab1a9ae
0751a16
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
switching to
dep:tokio
style as was done in other crates — let me know if this one was deliberately left unchangedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this legal Rust? My brain compiler is unsure but it could avoid the need for the
addrs
function I think.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is legal syntax, but neither IfWatcher implementation implements this trait, plus
into_iter
consumesself
, so we wouldn’t be able to use this here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah damn!
The naming of
iter
suggested that we actually implement theIterator
trait but I guess the consuming nature ofIntoIterator
makes this unworkable anyway.Thanks for checking!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Returning the iterator would be possible using a HRTB, but given that this is only called in a rare error path I opted for the simpler approach.