new: adding firewall_id field to nodebalancers
#411
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lgarber-akamai
requested changes
Sep 19, 2023
jriddle-linode
force-pushed
the
new/firewall_id
branch
from
d2c82df
to
dbd5d9a
Compare
lgarber-akamai
requested changes
Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📝 Description
What does this PR do and why is this change necessary?
Adding
firewall_idfield to creating nodebalancers.✔️ How to Test
How do I run the relevant unit/integration tests?
make TEST_ARGS='-v nodebalancer_firewall' test