test: [M3-8768] - Cypress test flake: Rebuild Linode #11390
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AzureLatte
requested review from
jdamore-linode
and removed request for
a team
AzureLatte
requested review from
bnussman-akamai and
cpathipa
and removed request for
a team
bnussman-akamai
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2024
Cloud Manager UI test results🎉 467 passing tests on test run #2 ↗︎
|
cpathipa
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2024
jdamore-linode
added
Approved
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description 📝
The list of StackScripts loads before Cypress selects the search field, causing the search field to go out of view which triggers a failure in a should('be.visible') assertion. This can be fixed by adding .scrollIntoView before asserting the element's visibility.
Changes 🔄
List any change(s) relevant to the reviewer.
How to test 🧪
As an Author, to speed up the review process, I considered 🤔
👀 Doing a self review
❔ Our contribution guidelines
🤏 Splitting feature into small PRs
➕ Adding a changeset
🧪 Providing/improving test coverage
🔐 Removing all sensitive information from the code and PR description
🚩 Using a feature flag to protect the release
👣 Providing comprehensive reproduction steps
📑 Providing or updating our documentation
🕛 Scheduling a pair reviewing session
📱 Providing mobile support
♿ Providing accessibility support
As an Author, before moving this PR from Draft to Open, I confirmed ✅