Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Bump version to 6.5.6 #119

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

rb-union
Copy link
Contributor

Bump version to 6.5.6

Log: Bump version to 6.5.6

Bump version to 6.5.6

Log: Bump version to 6.5.6
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见:

  1. 版本号更新

    • linglong.yaml文件中,版本号从6.5.5.1更新到6.5.6.1,这是一个合理的版本更新。确保在更新版本号时,同时更新了相关的文档和发布说明。
  2. 运行时依赖更新

    • linglong.yaml文件中,运行时依赖从org.deepin.runtime.dtk/23.1.0/arm64更新到org.deepin.runtime.dtk/23.2.0/arm64。确认新版本的运行时依赖是否与当前的应用程序兼容,并且已经通过了充分的测试。
  3. changelog更新

    • debian/changelog文件中,版本号从6.5.5更新到6.5.6,并且添加了更新日志条目。确保更新日志条目包含了必要的更改说明,以便于维护者和用户了解版本更新的内容。
  4. 文件重复

    • linglong.yaml文件在arm64x86_64架构下都有相同的更新,这可能会导致重复的配置。建议检查是否有必要在两个架构下都进行相同的更新,或者是否可以合并配置。
  5. 代码风格

    • changelog文件中,日期和时间格式应保持一致,并且使用标准的日期格式。例如,Sat, 30 Nov 2024 18:42:50 +0800是一个标准的RFC 2822日期格式。
  6. 文档和注释

    • 确保所有更改都有相应的文档和注释,以便于其他开发者理解版本更新的目的和影响。

总体来说,这些更改看起来是合理的,但需要确保所有相关的依赖和测试都已经过验证,并且更新日志条目提供了足够的信息。

Copy link

TAG Bot

TAG: 6.5.6
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lzwind, rb-union

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@lzwind lzwind merged commit 0dc63f7 into linuxdeepin:develop/snipe Dec 2, 2024
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants