-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
use latest netlink-packet-generic as dependency in other subcrates #223
Conversation
c782075
to
0cedb93
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry about this. I'm traveling today so I can only make a release tonight (CET).
No rush! Thanks for taking a look (and for the latest release with wireguard support!). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Hey @mcginty Sorry for not coming back to this, I've had covid since last Friday. Will make a release in a couple days when I feel better. |
I hope the symptoms weren't too bad @little-dude, take your time recovering, open source necessarily is slightly less important than staying alive and healthy ;). I just got it as well a few weeks ago... I'm not blocked on a release or anything right now since I can depend on my fork's branch in the meanwhile! |
@mcginty I just made a new release! Let me know if you have further issues with these crates, I don't use them myself. https://github.com/little-dude/netlink/releases/tag/20220115 |
Otherwise a crate already depending on
netlink-packet-generic 0.3
will get errors like this when compiling: